It was with little fanfare that Jeep unveiled its new 2012 Grand Cherokee SRT8 at today's 2011 New York Auto Show. Not that the company isn't proud of the new high-performance model, which is in fact, the most powerful Jeep ever built. But the go-anywhere brand kept its act indoors this year, with the entire press conference taking place on the Chrysler show stand.
Jeep Brand President and CEO Mike Manley walked the audience through the specs, saying the new 465-horsepower 6.4-liter Hemi V8 is up 45 hp over the 6.1-liter V8 found in the 2010 Grand Cherokee SRT8.
Manley said the new Jeep is a "blend of utility and race-inspired design." The SUV has been lowered an inch and sports new SRT body cladding and a liftgate spoiler. Paddle shifters, new SRT seats and an 825-watt 19-speaker premium audio system with 10-inch subwoofer help freshen up the interior.
With a quarter-mile time in the mid-13 seconds, Manley didn't bother to bore the crowd with cargo capacity numbers.
![]()
elgac says:
12:23 PM, 04/20/11
That is one hell of a performer.
Claimed numbers:
0-60 in 4.8 seconds.
mid 13 ΒΌ mile.
.90-g skid pad.
60-0 in 116ft.
All while carrying 19 speakers.
gregnv says:
12:33 PM, 04/20/11
While appealing and cool, the timing is bad with gas over $4 a gallon in many states.
http://fuelgaugereport.aaa.com/?redirectto=http://fuelgaugereport.opisnet.com/index.asp
I still want it, but could I keep if fed?
louiswei says:
12:35 PM, 04/20/11
Awesome specs but... What's the point?
lostboyz says:
12:40 PM, 04/20/11
@louiswei, the point I'm guessing is that you have cars like the x5m, x6m, porsche cayenne, q7, etc that sell relatively well, why not offer an american car for half the price, most of the performance, and most of the features. Oh and theres the halo aspect of it that brings more people to the brand.
In the engineering world of bad-ass, you do not ask the question "why?" you ask "why not?"
cr_driver says:
12:50 PM, 04/20/11
The question for me is, can it perform better than the old one?
Full tests will answer that.
What about the weight?
And fuel economy?
We`ll see.
louiswei says:
01:16 PM, 04/20/11
@ lostboyz,
Ok then.
But just for the record, I consider the X5M, X6M (regardless of M or not) kind of pointless as well.
lostboyz says:
01:25 PM, 04/20/11
and this is the first pointless car in existance?
What is the point of any car really, other than transportation?
bodyblue says:
01:25 PM, 04/20/11
Cool car....terrible time to introduce it. MOPAR desperately needs a decent compact car....not a 400+hp truck.
bimmerjay says:
01:28 PM, 04/20/11
Those are surprisingly high-profile tires. A 1/4 mile in the mid-13's and a 0-60 in 4.8s doesn't seem that impressive with 465-hp underfoot. It must be the weight.
elgac says:
01:29 PM, 04/20/11
@ gregnv + cr_driver:
They say it will return 13-percent better fuel economy than its predecessor and 450 miles per tank.
anonimo says:
01:31 PM, 04/20/11
@louiswei--
This type of vehicle gets filed under the "have your cake and eat it too" category. For those with families that don't have the capacity to have both sports cars and family haulers, this makes for a nice compromise. Same with the X5M, Cayenne S/Turbo, or M63 AMG (for a lot more money).
However, I agree that there is no good reason the X6 exists.
louiswei says:
01:54 PM, 04/20/11
"This type of vehicle gets filed under the "have your cake and eat it too" category."
M5 wagon? E63 wagon? No?
jps429 says:
02:54 PM, 04/20/11
Those rims are horrible. They don't look good on an SUV, it looks like a hot hatch/sedan kind of rim.
Whats with those high profile tires? The old STR8 had a nice set of wheels, I hope there will be a better option.
http://i667.photobucket.com/albums/vv36/BOYCHIKS/BlackChrome/DSC_0172.jpg
anonimo says:
03:14 PM, 04/20/11
louiswei says:
""This type of vehicle gets filed under the "have your cake and eat it too" category."
M5 wagon? E63 wagon? No?"
Not exactly--those exclude AWD (and this will also provide more ground clearance for those regions and applications where that might be useful as well).
jeepsrt says:
03:50 PM, 04/20/11
I'm sure it is better in everyway than the first gen SRT8 but it is just too big and those wheels and front end are horrible. I have to say that living with an SRT8 Jeep for 4 1/2 years was fun, but just had too many limitations on where you could take it. I had to have a truck to go up to the mountains or off road of any kind.
coolb944 says:
03:52 PM, 04/20/11
This Jeep is one AWESOME looking machine. Every detail is worked out right, and I think the wheel design works well here. I bet that front end in your rear-view mirror would illicit a little fear or maybe a little wetness in the pants, hahahahaha!
firstwagon says:
04:11 PM, 04/20/11
"Cool car....terrible time to introduce it. MOPAR desperately needs a decent compact car....not a 400+hp truck"
Just decent? How about great?.....
http://www.fiatcanada.com/home/index.php
As for the SRT8, I love it. Sure it makes no sense whatsoever but that's the point. It's a low volume, high attitude image truck.... designed to eat Raptures for breakfast.
dougnash2009 says:
09:19 PM, 04/20/11
Oh, it's not too late to the party yet. Gas isn't even five-clams a gallon quite yet!
kevm14 says:
07:28 AM, 04/21/11
Rather than a do-all, I classify machines like this as a do-nothing. The AWD capability is really limited to impressing your friends in the rain. The tires and suspension are hardly off road capable. For winter driving, you'd really want different tires, and at that point, better tires on a RWD wagon (like the aforementioned choices, including the CTS-V wagon) would work well. The dry pavement performance resigns itself to merely "good for the size/weight/height" rather than "really good." So, I guess I don't get it. Same with the tall Germans (X6M, et al).
sgude says:
07:36 AM, 04/21/11
The wheel design is horrible. This sort of design belongs on a hot hatch; they don't exude any sense of power or strength like the last generation SRT8's wheels did. And the loss of the center-mounted exhaust outlets is disappointing. Then again, I never tow anything.
bodyblue says:
08:09 AM, 04/21/11
"Just decent? How about great?....."
The 500 is a sub-compact...Dodge needs a Caliber replacement ASAP. When I bought my Avenger, I drove a couple of Calibers over 6 months. The new one is really a pretty decent car but the MPGs are WORSE than my Pentastar V6 (for any auto Caliber). And since I had to have an automatic (I have leg problems because of diabetes and wife problems because she wont drive anything else :) ) I could not justify getting one over other choices in the class.