Thoughts from the Curb is Automotive Editor James Riswick's semi-regular blog that will take a deeper (and occasionally humorous) look at a particular automotive topic.
Eight years ago, the news editor of my college newspaper was hit by a car in the Pepperdine dorm parking lot. It wasn't serious, I don't recall him being injured and to date he's the only pedestrian I've personally known who's been hit with a car. He was fine.
Now, that's not to say it doesn't happen. I've seen the Great Gatsby and Meet Joe Black and as such, know getting hit by a car tends to ruin your day. Nevertheless, it seems like an inordinate amount of calories is being burned by world governments recently in regards to people getting hit with cars.
In Europe, pedestrian safety regulations have mandated tall, flat-faced front fascias, while mandating more underhood space and the development of fancy technologies to limit bodily injury should you get plowed.
Here in the United States, our pedestrian concerns have been limited to electric cars since you apparently can't hear the damn things. Organizations for the blind have been particularly vocal (no pun intended) and the government has jumped on board, proposing the Pedestrian Safety Enhancement Act (PSEA), which will essentially mandate that electric cars utilize some sort of artificial noise within a certain speed threshold.
In anticipation of the PSEA, Nissan has equipped its Leaf with an artificial noise when at such puttering speeds. It wasn't an easy task, however, as Nissan's researchers and engineers had to find a noise that was loud enough to be affective but not obnoxious to drivers and bystanders alike.
Initially, it experimented with music for some wacky reason, meeting with a German pipe organ expert and a music professor to compose special Leaf songs. Nissan engineer Tsuyoshi Kanuma told the Los Angeles Times "that it sounded like an ice cream truck."
For those of you who lack an imagination, I'm guessing it would've sounded something like this.
The actual acceleration sound is pretty much a louder version of a traditional electric motor noise, which according to tests by Western Michigan University is more audible than the typical gasoline engine.
Though Nissan is the first real company with a ready-to-purchase, full-electric car, there will certainly be more on the way, and with PSEA, they'll need to make artificial noises. The Chevy Volt is no exception and GM has already been at work developing such a system for future Volts (it presently chirps the horn when you flash the lights, which wouldn't comply with the PSEA's requirement of a continuous noise).
According to David Lake, manager of environment safety and possibilities for GM's public policy center, GM has been working with Western Michigan University and the National Federation of the Blind for two years to research and develop sounds before PSEA was even proposed.
"They've looked at a number of different sounds," Lake said. "You could call some of them 'techy' sort of sounds," which he equated to George Jetson's car. That would sound something like this.
"Then we have considered a hybrid of sounds," Lake said, combining the Jetsons car with more of a faux engine noise. "But we have yet to zero in on a particular sound."
This got me to thinking, however. Just as cars with internal combustion engines have signature noises (both from the engine and exhaust), couldn't electric cars take on similar aural qualities? Lake agreed, noting that such differentiation between models could have a future for electric cars.
Hell, if you're making fake engine noises, why not make a Chevy Volt Big Block Edition?
Or you could personalize your vehicle sounds, and blare whatever you damn well please. I think I'd go for a Rose Bowl vibe. It would certainly get people out of your way.
Kidding aside, what about the impetuous for these quiet car regulations: the blind?
"I have not had any personal problems (with hybrids), and I'm out there traveling around moreso than anybody," said Brian Bushway, a blind man who teaches echolocation skills (think dolphins and bats) to other blind people. "If you're looking and paying attention to quiet cars, it's just another thing you're looking for."
Now, Bushway is certainly better off than most blind folks, but he still sees such pedestrian safety issues as something that indeed transcends the blind.
"The concern is that blind people are going to be taken out by cars, but this is better for sighted people too because sighted people aren't paying attention to the world around them (as trained blind people are)," he said. "I've heard stories of elderly sighted people being run over by their mate. I haven't heard any stories of blind people being run over by silent cars, but I bet more sighted people are being hit by cars than blind people simply because of the population difference."
Indeed, between 2002 and 2006, an average of five blind pedestrians were killed by cars per year -- there were 4,881 total pedestrian fatalities in 2005. None were reported to have been killed by a Prius, by far the best-selling hybrid vehicle. Another study showed that the Prius was involved in pedestrian accidents only 0.3 percent more than traditional gasoline-powered cars. Stop the presses.
So really, of the 4,092 total pedestrian fatalities in 2009, how many could've been prevented by the person listening to their mother and looking both ways before they cross the street? Or what if they removed the damn earbuds and listened to the world around them rather than Lady Gaga? Also, those 4,092 deaths occurred with regular cars presumably moving a lot faster than whatever slow, noise-activating speed threshold of the future Volt in Jetsons mode.
As such, I'm standing by my stance that this pedestrian safety thing is being blown out of proportion. Pedestrian fatalities are actually at their lowest in 35 years, but they've been holding rather steady for a decade, and is that 800-person drop from '05 to '09 really the result of the relatively small percentage of new Euro-friendly flat-faced cars being introduced to the road? I seriously doubt it. Nevertheless, it certainly seems like idiot-proofing the world will continue, though if a Chevy Volt can sound like it's picking Elroy up from school, perhaps I'm on board after all.
Follow my abbreviated automotive musings on the Twitter @JRiswick
Videos by John Adolph and Seth Compton
altimadude05 says:
12:18 PM, 02/11/11
I like the Jetsons idea. May I add the Vuvuzella horn as an alternative?
Does Nissan have to make it sound like a jet turbine?
firstwagon says:
12:23 PM, 02/11/11
My neighbour hit a pedestrian last year in his old Dodge Cummins. It's the loudest non commercial vehicle on the road and yet the guy walked out right in front of him.
Making more noise won't help. The trouble is with the pedestrians.
clarkma5 says:
12:52 PM, 02/11/11
The whole thing's a political campaign pushed by oil companies and other interested vested in the ICE to demonize hybrids and electric cars, and our congress fell for it because the know where their campaign dollars come from. What a joke.
arm51 says:
07:24 AM, 02/14/11
I'd have to agree with firstwagon, the problem is with the pedestrians. I'm a native Chicagoan and, admittedly, I jaywalk every day. The difference is that I actually pay attention to what is coming down the street, unlike most of the other jaywalkers. In the end, adding noises to electric cars will probably be a good thing, but it won't be the solution to pedestrian incidents.
eidolways says:
07:45 AM, 02/14/11
The Prius was involved in 0.3 percent more pedestrian accidents (not fatalities, I assume)? Obviously, that must be because it's a SILENT KILLER!
OK, not really.
Hybrid cars have some quirks, as noted ever here on the Edmunds blogs, such as a twitchy throttle pedal at low speeds. I'll bet that slight rate increase can be attributed not to the Prius's lack of noise, but rather to the quirks that come part and parcel with a hybrid's operation.
throwback says:
07:46 AM, 02/14/11
You can never go wrong with a big block, but I would prefer the Ferrari F1 V10 from Schumachers day.
captainvw says:
07:49 AM, 02/14/11
Im tellin ya, they need to have programmable exhaust notes so cars can have a decent noise level like other cars on the road. I would use the ferrari from india's exhaust
http://www.isitcool.com/ferrari/index.html
xD
cwc1 says:
11:02 AM, 02/14/11
Unfortunately, nanny statism spreads through the world once started by those with too much time on their hands and not enough wisdom to understand why it's better for all of society for them to keep out of other peoples' business. It has been spreading like a cancer because few people in government have the guts to oppose it.
stovt001 says:
01:46 PM, 02/14/11
I've been hit by a car - I was out for a run and was going across a stop-sign controlled intersection. I arrived before the Mercedes, made eye contact with the driver, and continued on, but apparently the Mercedes driver thought stop signs meant "come to a complete stop then immediately go again, regardless of what is in front of you" and over the hood and roof I went. Other than losing a thin layer of skin on my leg, some bruising, and really sore pecs (I landed face-down in a pushup position on the car and used my flexed arms to soften the blow) I was OK. Beyond perhaps banning hood ornaments (I couldn't be more thankful this Mercedes had the Star in the grill) I don't see much benefit to increased pedestrian impact safety measures relative to their cost. As far as I could tell, any car going much faster than the one that hit me is going to do significant damage no matter what. You just can't get around the physics.
jriz says:
02:29 PM, 02/14/11
^^ Glad you're OK. This is why I stick to treadmills. That way I only have to worry about flying off into a wall due to my own incompetance.
In regards to hood ornaments, the Mercedes one is actually collapsible. It would've bent back. The Rolls-Royce one will actually drop into the radiator grille if impacted. However, pedestrian impact is the reason why the Jaguar leaper is no more and the Hyundai Equus doesn't get the sharp flying thing outside Korea.
markroger2k101 says:
04:25 PM, 02/14/11
Automotive News [sub] reports that Mercedes-Benz has agreed to take over Smart car distribution in the United States from Penske Automotive Group after about three years of operating as a Penske-run distribution channel. Beginning in July, Mercedes will take over all of Smart’s US-based operations because
1. It needs the small-car volume to meet new corporate average fuel economy standards that take effect in the United States in the 2016 model year.
Please take a look at following link.
=========
used cars