Speaking to approximately 75 percent of Chrysler dealers, Sergio Marchionne announced and subsequently revealed the 2012 Dodge Viper Concept. "We had been debating this particular nameplate for a long time," said the Fiat and Chrysler CEO, "and every time I just could not get there. And then one morning the product committee went into the dome and saw it, and we all knew we were in front of something magic, unique. It took less than five minutes for the committee to fund the initiative. Not a negative comment, not a remark, not a single question. And so I leave you with this. The 17th car in the lineup, in select dealers in 2012."
Five minutes to find the funds? Not a negative comment? And this is with a product committee-- aka, beancounters?
The Alfa 8C is one of the most beautiful, sinfully smooth cars we've ever seen. The Viper...not so much. It's a brute and it looks the part. Cool, sure, but the rumor goes that the new Viper looks like an 8C with a Viper face. We're not seeing it yet, but the hopes are high.
Sergio also announced that the 9-speed automatic transmission for FWD application will debut soon after the 8-speed automatic for rear-drive applications which is scheduled for 2012.
( Autoweek )
questionlp says:
03:35 PM, 09/16/10
Mario block + return of the Viper in 2012 = 1-UP
9-speed transmission for FWD = 1-UP-manship at work (though shifting through each gear would feel like the same thing as the Princess is in another castle)
half_ton says:
03:53 PM, 09/16/10
This is surprising. The only 9 speed auto I knew of was in development by MB and that was never confirmed; it was just a rumor I heard. I would love to know the specs on that gearbox. Some say/think 8 speeds is too many but I know the ZF unit has lees planetary gearsets than the Toyota unit. It will be interesting to see how this unit works.
GM is going to get left behind if they don't get on the ball soon!
06scooby says:
04:18 PM, 09/16/10
9 speeds? that's getting rediculous... whatever car that has that is gonna spend more time between gears than in gears!
gregnv says:
04:38 PM, 09/16/10
Take a look at the Devon Motorworks GTX (sans wing), a viper based "super car" that shares a resemblance to the 8c (not as sexy as the 8c in my opinion, but still smoother than the current Viper). http://www.devonmotorworks.com/supercars.php
gregnv says:
04:43 PM, 09/16/10
Oops, almost forgot. A 9 speed Italian automatic transmission? Hmm, lots of gear hunting, lots of parts, lots to go wrong. Sounds risky for those of us that want average modern reliability.
Also, at what point do the number of gears equate to an overly complex CVT?
ptcdawg says:
06:15 PM, 09/16/10
At some point, enough is enough with the gears.
sarahpalin says:
07:37 PM, 09/16/10
9 friggin' gears? I hope those manuel-loving blowhards will enjoy shifting through each and every stinkin' one of them, in an H x 3 configuration no less!
geokilla says:
08:23 PM, 09/16/10
This is getting ridiculous. 9 speed automatic. They better optimize it so I don't have to wait for the transmission to switch gears just so I can accelerate. They better have the kickdown feature where it can skip gears too, say going from 9th to 4th.
@sara. Unfortunately, manual is stuck at 6 speeds.
slickersdrip says:
09:24 PM, 09/16/10
Wow, someone who has their name as "sarahpalin" obviously goading people on a car enthusiast blog to dislike him/her. That's original.
I agree with gregnv... at some point it's just too complex and fails to reach any goals that cannot be reached by a good CVT.
chunky_azian says:
12:07 AM, 09/17/10
I once drove a tour bus with a 10 speed automatic. It starts in 2nd and skip some gears upshifting. Some buses have 12 speed automatics. If you want to get technical about it, it was a single clutch automated manual. But as far as the DMV driver licensing was concerned, 2 pedal = license restricted to automatic.
Most trucks have at least 9 gears these days. It isn't that complicated--just a 5 speed with 5 low range gears and 4 high range. There are also 18 speed trucks, which is basically a 9 speed with direct and overdrive on each gear.
For the sake of fuel efficiency, a small engine needs multiple ratio transmissions to achieve adequate performance. I would like it if my car has a 8 speed manual instead of the ubiquitous 5 speed, with lower gears to concur San Francisco hills and a higher gear for cruising.
acbayard says:
12:27 AM, 09/17/10
A 9-speed automatic, much like a CVT, is only as good as the engineer that paired it with the engine. Anyone who has ever ridden a bicycle will know that your power production sweet spot is fairly fixed at a certain rpm. A road bike might have two chainrings on the crank and ten cogs on the rear cassette, giving the cyclist a possible 20 ratios (18 of which are actually usable due to chain crossing).
CVTs and automatics with many ratios just permit engineers to start an engine design with a focus on efficiency, emissions, and torque performance from the ground up. If a particular engine design yields great efficiency but poor low-end torque, a CVT can be programmed to start at a particularly low drive ratio, revving the engine to the sweet spot and then gradually reducing the rpm, and provide a modulation not possible with fixed gear ratios.
Basically, there's a reason why CVTs are banned in F1.
aznraptor says:
01:48 AM, 09/17/10
yeah, for normal cars, might as well go CVT
do CVTs still have the problem of slipping when there's too much torque?
1487 says:
05:32 AM, 09/17/10
"Oops, almost forgot. A 9 speed Italian automatic transmission? Hmm, lots of gear hunting, lots of parts, lots to go wrong. Sounds risky for those of us that want average modern reliability. "
I doubt the tranny will be engineered by an Italian company. The 8 speeed chrysler will offer is designed by ZF, not Chrysler or Fiat. BMW and Audi use transmissions from suppliers, they are not designed in house. GM and ZF make BMW trannies.
piredon says:
06:15 AM, 09/17/10
chunky_azian makes a good point. However, the reason for so many speeds in large trucks and busses is the narrow operating range of the engines that power them. We're talking between 1000 and 2800 RPM at the extremes, versus maybe 1500 to 6000 RPM for an average car engine. First the extreme weight means you need a very short 1st gear. After 1st, you need a ton of gears in a big rig just to match the speed of the vehicle to the total operating range of the engine, or you'd have a very hard time accelerating.
For a car, 4 gears are generally more than adequate. 3 used to work fine for basic forward momentum. Anything more than that is just trying to match car speed with efficient engine operating ranges. More gears = more ability to keep the engine in the sweet spot. But completely unnecessary for actual forward movement.
The question I haven't been able to answer is whether a dual clutch tranny with 6 speeds is more efficient than a torque converter automatic with 8 speeds.
half_ton says:
10:00 AM, 09/17/10
"I doubt the tranny will be engineered by an Italian company. The 8 speeed chrysler will offer is designed by ZF, not Chrysler or Fiat. BMW and Audi use transmissions from suppliers, they are not designed in house. GM and ZF make BMW trannies."
Audi and BMW are both now using the 8 speed auto supplied by ZF. I hope GM will soon also as that tranny has been proven to help maximize performance.
venom21 says:
02:48 PM, 09/17/10
Were not talkin bout basic forward movement Pirdeon stop sound so damn lame! U want basic forward movement go buy a Toyota. THat is basic transportation at its worst.
threemopars says:
06:06 PM, 09/17/10
"For a car, 4 gears are generally more than adequate."
And that's what they've given you. Except then you'll complain that it's "old" and "outdated"....so they go ahead and develop a 9 speed automatic....and now it's "too much".
The question is: What's going to make anyone happy? Seriously. I mean heres a company that's been treated like an alien, beat down and driven into a pile of nothing, and yet when they totally leapfrog everyone (including the Asians) it becomes "too much".
chunky_azian says:
01:14 AM, 09/18/10
My parensts had a 3 speed Corolla. That thing required kickdown to 2nd at 55 mph when climbing a hill, drank gas like a fish for a compact car, and roared on the highway. When that 3 speed transmission committed seppuku, it was replaced by a 4 speed Echo. It had much better fuel efficiency but there was still a wide gap between 2nd and 3rd. They also have a Honda Fit with a 5 speed auto. Out of the handful of times that I've driven it, not once did I think it was in the wrong gear.
4 gears are adequate for midsize cars with a V6. Those engines are fill almost any gap between the wide gear ratios
But like I've pointed out. A big truck's engine can either be too big when bob tailing or way too small when hauling an oversize load. They need all 18 gears for the special situation. Likewise, a subcompact with a motorcycle size engine should be paired with a 9 speed transmission. It may only need 6when one person is driving it on level ground, but the other 3 are necessary when it is loaded to the gill and going up hill.