A former Ford engineer was arrested on Wednesday after a FBI investigation revealed that he had stolen sensitive information in an attempt to secure jobs in China.
Xiang Dong Yu, a Chinese national, worked for Ford as a product engineer from 1997 to 2007. He left for a job at a Chinese company, but in his last days at Ford he copied thousands of pages of design documents to a external hard drive.
Ford alerted the FBI about the security breach and after a lengthy investigation, Yu was arrested at Chicago's O'Hare International Airport after returning to the U.S. on a flight from Beijing.
brn says:
07:45 AM, 10/16/09
Throw the book at him and anyone else that was involved.
jackson611 says:
08:06 AM, 10/16/09
He wasn't stealing information on how to make a car. It was how NOT to make a car. lol.
ctpax says:
10:17 AM, 10/16/09
chinese at their best.
greenpony says:
10:45 AM, 10/16/09
The damage has been done.
firstwagon says:
11:14 AM, 10/16/09
Looks like the Chinese even steal the top style of "research" from North American companies.
We invent something like Industrial Espionage and they go and steal that idea too.
brn says:
12:11 PM, 10/16/09
firstwagon, that's one area where the Chinese have definitely surpassed NA.
firstwagon says:
12:31 PM, 10/16/09
Maybe, maybe not.
Check out the number of patent lawsuits that any major NA corporation is involved in at any given time. You'd be surprised how many companies have built their fortunes on reverse engineering.
The big difference is the Chinese aren't discreet enough about it and don't have enough lawyers yet to cover it up with paperwork.
inlinesix says:
01:23 PM, 10/16/09
Wow smart guy. Steal the information and come back to the U.S. afterward. Hopefully Ford hired smarter guys for the rest of engineering.
brn says:
01:47 PM, 10/16/09
FW, reverse engineering is one thing (and often legal). Outright data theft is another.
firstwagon says:
03:55 PM, 10/16/09
Reverse engineering is stealing someones ideas, no different then stealing data.
Just harder to prove.
brn says:
04:30 PM, 10/16/09
It is different. A number of years ago, I worked for a well known high-tech company. We reverse engineered our competitions products and they reverse engineered ours. Base on that knowledge, we would design to the same end result, but using a different process than the competition (they'd do the same). It was all legal, as long as we could demonstrate zero insider knowledge. What differs with this Ford example is they have significant insider knowledge.
One infamous example was the reverse engineering of the IBM BIOS for early PC clones. IBM fought it and lost.
Moral? Maybe, maybe not. Legal? It can be.
jimveta says:
11:04 PM, 10/16/09
Reverse engineering is certainly not stealing and absolutely ethical in my opinion.
Aftermarket car companies have to so some reverse engineering all the time in order to get their make their products compatible with stock parts. This is especially true with ECUs/chips.
You can have a completely original design all the while using reverse engineering to figure out the requirements for your product. (e.g. the interface, the limits, the format of the end result, etc)
jimveta says:
11:23 PM, 10/16/09
Actually, not just aftermarket companies, but the car companies themselves regularly engage in reverse engineering. I recall an article that showed how GM regularly disassembles competitor's cars and this article detailed their disassemble of the Prius.
See also this article - "Porsche Buying a Tesla Roadster to Study It"
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/News/articleId=136488
firstwagon says:
12:18 PM, 10/18/09
Reverse engineering generally means buying a competitors products and taking it apart so you can copy the ideas and sell them as your own product.
It infringes on patent laws and intellectual property laws. It is illegal and immoral.
It is widely done in companies that don't want to pay for the R&D on doing their own designs.
There is no problem with studying the competitions work but as an engineer your job is to design something better, not to copy.
How can you be the best when all you have to sell is someone elses old ideas?
brn says:
09:34 PM, 10/18/09
FW, reverse engineering has a more broad definition than you give it.
Google around a little bit:
http://www.google.com/search?q=define:Reverse+engineering