The beat down rental car has been a symbol of the domestic auto industry's woes for decades now, but the recent upheaval has suddenly turned the tide. According to a report in the Los Angeles Times, rental companies are now buying more foreign cars than domestic brands.
"Hertz now carries as many Toyotas as Fords," according to the article. "The Nissan Altima has edged out the Chevy Impala as the top-selling car in the rental market. But the real shocker is the Koreans. Combined, automakers Kia and Hyundai grabbed a 9.5% share of the U.S. rental market last year, their highest total ever."
On one hand, getting rid of their dependence on fleet sales is a good thing for the domestics, but on the other hand, if it's done right rental cars can provide easy exposure. Should be interesting to see how it shakes out for the likes of Hyundai and Toyota.
L.A. Times: Detroit loses its edge in rental car market
blueguydotcom says:
08:55 AM, 07/22/09
Where? I can't for the life of me get my hands on anything but GM and Mopar products when I rent!
1487 says:
09:06 AM, 07/22/09
So when the Asian automakers start relying on fleet sales we find out its a positive thing. Talk about spin and double standards. Relying on rental fleets has ALWAYS been considered a negative thing for resale value and brand equity. Dont try and change it up just because Toyota and NIssan are now rental crazy.
togonation says:
09:44 AM, 07/22/09
priceless.. they spin it as if rental sales are a good thing when in actuality toyota and the koreans are dumping cars their for sales like the domestics did.
last I checked korean cars don't have awesome residuals.
blueguydotcom says:
10:00 AM, 07/22/09
Wonder if the asian manus are decontenting cars for rental fleets too?
bankerdanny says:
10:14 AM, 07/22/09
I have definitely tried to use my multiple rentals over the years to try out different cars. I rent primarily from Hertz.
In the past 24 months I have rented a Mazda3 5-door, a 4cyl RAV4, a CX9, a Toyota Corolla, a Nissan Versa, a PT Cruiser, a Subaru Forester, a Mazda5, a Sonata, and a Ford Fusion.
Hertz in particular seems to have a good mix of domestics and imports.
mirth says:
12:31 PM, 07/22/09
Hyundai and Kia are venturing into the "dumping" territory that the domestics have just (rightly) fled from. Despite all the hype on the Korean companies lately, I still think that their management is going to find a way, like this, to mess up that momentum.
j2j says:
12:41 PM, 07/22/09
While not necessarily a good move for Toyota or Nissan, it's not really a bad move by Hyundai/Kia since it's probably the best way to get people to try/drive their models (and hence, possibly get "conquest purchasers").
I would suspect w/ the upcoming next gen Hyundai/Kia models arriving the next couple of years, that Hyundai/Kia would roll back on fleet sales.
1487 says:
01:10 PM, 07/22/09
I wonder if this story is going to get widespread coverage. for years we have been hearing how only domestics due rental sales because they cant actually sell their cars to retail customers. We were told it hurts resale value which is another reason why the know it all import manufacturers shunned rental sales. Now we learn that rental sales are actually a GOOD thing. In fact the LA Times article makes it sound like a bad thing that Detroit 3 reduced fleet sales.
kingkhalas says:
02:10 PM, 07/22/09
I think people associate rental cars with cheap cars they probably wouldn't buy.
bankerdanny says:
02:14 PM, 07/22/09
The problem was that GM et al sold the least appealing versions of the cars (underpowered and underequiped) and so renters came away with bad impressions. Although to be fair I think this was as much the fault of the rental agencies who wanted the cheapest cars.
Hertz seems to do a good job of buying cars with medium equipement levels. I had a Fusion a couple weeks ago with the V6 and Synch.
1487 says:
02:38 PM, 07/22/09
Most rental cars are the base models, even the foreign ones. If rental agencies want cheap cars they are going to get base models. Several years back GM said they were going to sell higher trim models to rental agencies. I had a Lacrosse rental with leather and power seats a few years back.
firstwagon says:
03:27 PM, 07/22/09
I've found most rental are base cars but with some sort of "value package" of popular options on them.
I don't see any problem with imports being used as rentals. I've rented several of them myself.
I can't see the rental companies getting the big discounts they do from the big 3 though. At least not on the more popular models.
drissel27 says:
07:51 PM, 07/22/09
this is true, i've noticed it over the last 2 years. I rent a lot and I always use National so i can get points toward free rentals... i always take the premium class car. they used to have Impala SS - really fast, rumbling V8, leather, XM radio, and on-star. Every once in a while I'd get one with a sunroof. I never took the Lucerne. They had Pontiac G8 GTs for a short while - I even totaled one! But about 2 years ago, they started to phase the GM cars out. they bought Toyota Avalons, which was surprisingly good - it's crazy roomy (the back seat reclines), it's super-smooth, powerful, the ride is serene, and the front seats are wide, comfy, and supportive.
Now they have Maximas (base, sunroof, but no leather), Avalons, Chrysler 300s (I never take the Chryslers - they have the seatbelt chime that does not stop unless you actually put the seatbelt on - I hate that!). I was absolutely shocked and disgusted earlier this year to see Kia Optimas on the premium row. Never in a million years would I drive that crap.
pflyer says:
11:13 PM, 07/22/09
Couple of points:
1. The rentals I have had (Cobalt/Impala/G6) have been fairly well equipped with power accessories and alloy wheels and so on.
2. An Altima rental return will hold its value much better than an Impala or Taurus would, IMHO. Perception for many is reality and Japanese cars are considered "more better" than American Brand cars. Not saying it is right, it just is. A drive through a Car Max lot would confirm this.
3. The Koreans are a different story. I would think rental return Kias and Hyundais would be toxic on a used car lot. New ones are discounted thousands off the sticker (at least here in DFW) and I cannot imagine any Korean car maker doing well dumping rentals on the market. I like many of the Korean cars, but there's that perception thing again... Again, all IMHO.
darthbimmer says:
05:13 AM, 07/23/09
Selling cars into rental fleets can go either way. It depends on execution. The domestics harmed many of their brands because they: 1) dumped too many cars into the rental companies, 2) dumped them in there too cheaply because of the excess supply, and 3) built too many low-content vehicles. #1 and #2 led to low resale values. It's really just an issue of supply and demand, nevermind whether the cars were initially sold to fleets or private owners. The Japanese and Korean makers can avoid this problem but not building excessive supply.
Issue #3 led to poor brand perception. I think Dodge is the poster child for screwing this up. I've rented too many Avengers with hand-crank windows to ever recommend that model to anyone. The Chargers that fill many rental lots could be great ambassadors for that brand, but nearly all of them are equipped with the anemic base engine. Few potential buyers will see past that bad experience to understand that with a V8, or even the optional step-up V6, the car's much more interesting.
By contrast, my rental experiences with many foreign makes have impressed me. I rented a Hyundai Sonata and a Toyota Sienna, both with V6 engines and a moderate level of options. I now enthusiastically recommend both to friends who are shopping those respective segments.
Selling product into fleets is not bad. Selling bad product, and selling too much of it, is bad.
redgeminipa says:
05:56 AM, 07/23/09
I'm not sure which rental company it was from, but a friend of mine flew in from CA and showed up with a loaded Impala rental. I was rather impressed that an Impala with that much equipment was offered. I believe it was an LTZ with leather, sunroof, nice wheels etc. He even mentioned the stereo sounded good. He owns a new loaded Passat, so if he was somewhat impressed with the Impala, then it definitely was not a stripped down model.
1487 says:
06:21 AM, 07/23/09
darth:
I dont think you are understanding what rental sales can do to resale value. Nothing has changed just because imports are now taking over the rental market. You are presuming that the import manufacturers are being "smart" but there is no proof of that. You seem to forget that the Japanese dont believe in laying people off or closing factories. What does that mean? It means you have to keep making cars. They are making up for the loss of retail sales with low profit rental sales because they have to pay their workers anyway. rental cars hurt resale because they are dumped on the used car market after a year or two with tons of miles. This is why rental fleet sales are more damaging than government or corporate fleet sales- the market that Detroit still owns. An Impala police car does little to hurt resale of Impalas owned by retail customers.
Nissan is now relying on rentals for 29% of sales and that is not good. In years past Detroit was blasted for doing that type of thing. Now its totally different when Nissan engages in the same behavior. One reason why residuals on imports were higher is because of the lack of fleet penetration. Over time you will see that gap continue to shrink because of the imports increased reliance of fleets and the backing off by domestics. right now Camry and Malibu residuals are about the same.