Lexus has a new vehicle-based telematics system called Enform that will debut on the equally new HS 250h in late summer. Toyota had previously been one of several OnStar carmaker partners in the U.S., but OnStar is going it alone and is now available only on GM vehicles.
In developing an offshoot of the successful Japan-based G-Book and G-Link, Toyota's U.S. operation has switched its partnership to ATX Group, the other major telematics service provider in America. Toyota will have its own dedicated ATX call center.
There are two tiers of service categories for the subscription-based Enform: safety (which Toyota calls Safety Connect) and convenience. The safety tier includes automatic crash notification, stolen vehicle location, emergency assistance SOS, and enhanced roadside assistance.
Automatic crash notification (ACN) will automatically phone the call center in the event of either an airbag deployment or a severe rear-end collision. If the answering agent is unable to communicate with the occupants, the call center will request assistance from the nearest emergency services provider.
Stolen vehicle location provides vehicle tracking assistance via GPS and embedded cellular technology. A police report must first be filed.
If the HS driver has an on-road emergency, an emergency assistance (SOS) switch is available to summon help. SOS will call the Safety Connect response center and dispatch emergency assistance as required. The SOS button can also be used to summon warranty-based Lexus roadside service, which is enhanced over traditional roadside assistance by the addition of GPS data.
Lexus Enform adds two interesting convenience features to the Safety Connect tier: Destination Assist and eDestination. With Destination Assist, drivers can speak with live operators who can help them find a street address, a business by name, or a type of business, then send the information to the vehicle's navigation system for calculations and routing. This eliminates street destination input or the point-of-interest (POI) search that some drivers find challenging.
eDestination is another way for drivers to avoid directly entering destinations into their navigation systems. From the comfort of their own personal computers, HS owners can search destinations by address, category or POI on the Lexus Web site. Destinations can be saved, organized, and then sent to their vehicles, where they will be available to be loaded in the navigation system the next time the vehicle is driven. This system allows the car owner the convenience and comfort of being at home when searching for frequent destinations.
Similar convenience features were also recently added to OnStar's system. In fact, almost all of Enform's features are available on OnStar. Toyota hasn't yet added Web browser, e-mail or text messaging, some of which are available on G-Book in Japan.
So Enform may end up with consumer appeal similar to that of OnStar, which has not been successful at all. OnStar's renewal rates have never been disclosed, but are widely believed to be well below 50 percent.
On the other hand, Ford has been wildly successful with its Sync system, which centers on the driver's own mobile phone handset.
So which is better: Sync or OnStar/Enform?
Sync has focused on Bluetooth and MP3 capability, not on navigation and emergency response as with OnStar and Enform. And up to now, Sync has not charged any subscription fees, but that may change with the introduction of traffic and directions information.
OnStar advertising also counters that in a severe collision the occupants could be incapacitated, or the mobile handset will fly about the cabin, preventing any 911 call from being placed.
It's unclear which of these two directions (handset-based vs. vehicle-based telematics) the rest of the industry will follow, as many carmakers have dropped out the telematics game altogether. Subscription- based telematics is not as financially lucrative as industry forecasts had predicted.
Lexus gives you a one-year complimentary subscription to Enform for HS buyers (navi-equipped cars) or one-year free Safety Connect (non-navi vehicles), so you can decide for yourself if it's worthwhile.
However, considering OnStar's lack of success despite massive investment and marketing, we doubt that many Lexus buyers will be renewing their Enform subscriptions when that free year expires.
Albert Austria, Senior Vehicle Evaluation Engineer, Inside Line
adb4 says:
06:38 AM, 06/ 8/09
A few thoughts...
1. I think Sync and OnStar/Enform are apples and oranges--the former focused on connectivity/entertainment and the latter on safety/security. GM offers Bluetooth and USB connectivity separate from OnStar (and I believe Toyota does as well), so it's pointless to compare the two, although obviously Ford is hoping to expand the Sync brand to add safety/security.
2. Hard to really compare Enform and OnStar until you have pricing information. However, to get Enform, you have to drop $2K or so to get the Lexus navigation system--a requirement OnStar doesn't have--so that may give GM a leg up, depending on how Toyota prices the Enform subscription.
sigmabody says:
11:04 AM, 06/ 8/09
Enform is an ironic name for the system, given the somewhat disturbing revelation that the government can listen in on your conversations through the OnStar system any time, without a warrant, and regardless of if the system is "on" or not. Maybe they can name the options package which adds the Enform option the "Big Brother" package.
I know that I'm wary about buying a new car with more built-in technology to allow spying on the occupants, but maybe that's just me. I don't doubt that it's a good idea to add, though: just look at how wildly financially successful GM has become since they added OnStar to all their vehicles.
mirth says:
12:03 PM, 06/ 8/09
I think the problem with Enform/OnStar is that American consumers are starting to get "monthly fee fatigue". We're now paying monthly fees for cell phones, TV (cable/satellite), satellite radio, internet connection, and on and on. That's why I like Sync better - a one time, small cost, plus I get Bluetooth, entertainment, and voice recognition? Sold. I don't have any money left for all of these monthly services.
breif says:
01:10 PM, 06/ 8/09
It bothers me that it is spelled "enform." It's not a word; it makes no sense.
Why not "Inform?" Too obvious of an answer?
cartechguy says:
04:44 PM, 06/ 8/09
The article fails to mention that SYNC already has 911 Assist which has no subscription fees (ever) and Ford did not increase the price of SYNC when it was released last Fall. 911 Assist does not use a third party call center and helps connect someone directly to a local 911 Operator after an accident using your personal cell phone. It also speaks to the operator to let them now you were in an accident (in case you can't for yourself). SYNC also has Complimentary Turn by Turn Directions plus information services free for 3 years. I think using your own cell phone is the way to go -
cwc1 says:
05:38 PM, 06/ 8/09
"...consumers are starting to get "monthly fee fatigue". We're now paying monthly fees for cell phones, TV (cable/satellite), satellite radio, internet connection, and on and on."
I concur, as this would be one of my considerations, as well as the potential privacy concerns. There would have to be a lot of value there, before I took on yet another cash flow reducer. They all add up.
estreka says:
06:32 PM, 06/ 8/09
No offense, but anyone that throws down $40K for a Prius with leather is an idiot.
jeffweimer says:
07:26 PM, 06/ 8/09
OnStar going it alone with GM, and abandoning it's (few) other manufacturers who have signed on?
Stupid. Just plain stupid.
depot84 says:
06:02 AM, 06/ 9/09
I completely agree that comparing sync to onstar or enform is apples and oranges. I have had onstar in several vehicles over it's entire life span and I have always enjoyed it. I wish they had some type of connectivity with the cars antenna for your cell phone to boost signal but other than that it's pretty much great. You can also purchase subscriptions on longer terms than monthly and they are less expensive.
1487 says:
06:10 AM, 06/ 9/09
Toyota is determined to do everything GM has ever done, for better or worse.
SnakeDoctor says:
10:09 AM, 06/ 9/09
Sync and OnStar are direct competitors. The differences are noted in the article, but Sync is making a push into OnStar's domain with Navigation and emergency response. They even make veiled references to each other in their advertising.
Re Sync 911 Assist: Since the article concerned Enform, I didn't want to get into detail, but it doesn’t seem too robust. I would think most of the time the BT connection would drop or the phone will be physically disabled or destroyed in a severe collision. I haven't seen any demonstrations, but I'm not sure I would trust it.
Re these subscriptions: I certainly wouldn't pay for it, as most of you, but how many of you or your friends pay $100/mo for mobile phone or Sat TV?
Regards,
Snake Doc
cartechguy says:
09:07 PM, 06/10/09
RE:SnakeDoctor
In reference to 911 Assist. I know that the SYNC system pairs up to 12 phones and if the BT connection gets interrupted in the crash it trys to reconnect or make a new connection to another if needed or available to make the emergency call. I keep my phone in my laptop bag or pocket when using SYNC. I guess their is always a chance something may happen to the phone since accidents are unpredictable. But that is true with all of these systems. I guess we can still rely on the good samaritan to call for us.. I don't happen to drive in the middle of nowhere that often.