Straightline

The car enthusiasts news blog from Inside Line

IL Track Tested: 2009 Audi A3 2.0T vs. 2009 Audi A4 2.0T Quattro

track-audis-flipper2.jpg

 

Inside Line tests hundreds of vehicles a year, but not every vehicle gets a full write-up. The numbers still tell a story, though, so we present "IL Track Tested." It's a quick rundown of all the data we collected at the track, along with comments direct from the test drivers. Enjoy.


We've all heard it a million times. Americans don't dig hatchbacks. The Euros can't get enough of them, but bring one to the States and it instantly becomes some kind of niche vehicle with a cult following. A very small cult following.

Audi knew all this when it introduced the A3 back in 2006, but it plowed ahead anyway. It was hoping that the A3's more reasonable price, potent 2.0-liter engine and useful configuration would finally win over some buyers who couldn't quite step up to an A4 Avant.

So how much are you giving up by choosing the A3 over the all-new A4 these days? The balance of power has shifted a bit, as the A4 now uses an upgraded 2.0T that delivers 211 horsepower and 258 pound-feet of torque. The A3's similar size four-cylinder continues with 200 hp and 207 lb-ft.

In this case, our A3 tester was helped out by the presence of a six-speed manual transmission and front-wheel drive to save some weight. The more powerful A4 uses a traditional six-speed automatic funneled through a Quattro all-wheel-drive system. Care to guess which one was the better track car? Full details after the jump.


Vehicle: 2009 Audi A3 2.0T

Odometer: 6,421
Date: 05/19/09
Driver: Chris Walton
Price: $34,520

Specifications:
Drive Type: Front-wheel drive
Transmission Type: 6-speed manual
Engine Type: Inline-4
Displacement (cc / cu-in): 1,984cc (121 cu-in)
Redline (rpm): 6,500
Horsepower (hp @ rpm): 200 @ 5,100
Torque (lb-ft @ rpm): 207 @ 1,800
Brake Type (front): Ventilated disc
Brake Type (rear): Disc
Steering System: Electric speed-proportional power steering
Suspension Type (front): Independent, MacPherson struts
Suspension Type (rear): Independent, multilink
Tire Size (front): 225/40R18 92Y
Tire Size (rear): 225/40R18 92Y
Tire Brand: Bridgestone
Tire Model: Potenza RE050A
Tire Type: Summer
Wheel Size: 18-by-7.5 inches
Wheel Material (front/rear): Alloy
As tested Curb Weight (lb): 3,288

Test Results:
0 - 30 (sec): 2.7
0 - 45 (sec): 4.7
0 - 60 (sec): 7.2
0 - 75 (sec): 10.1
1/4 Mile (sec @ mph): 15.2 @ 92.6
0-60 with 1-ft Rollout (sec): 6.9
30 - 0 (ft): 27
60 - 0 (ft): 107
Braking Rating: Excellent
Slalom (mph): 68.3
Skid Pad Lateral acceleration (g): 0.90
Handling Rating: Excellent
Db @ Idle: 44.3
Db @ Full Throttle: 74.6
Db @ 70 mph Cruise: 69.5

Acceleration Comments: Crazy wheel hop almost makes my vision blurry. Even with a gentle clutch-intensive launch, going to WOT spins the tires. Lots of torque available. That said, the clutch pedal is very soft (too soft) and shifter is equally feathery. Good gear spacing keeps it in the power. (Forgot to make a run with TC on)

Braking Comments: Powerful and consistent. No fade detected in five-plus stops. Moderate pedal effort.

Handling Comments: Skid pad: First attempt in 3rd gear proved difficult due to lagging throttle response. Better results in 2nd gear with higher rpm, but then coated the intake with oil slosh, producing a big cloud of smoke. Otherwise, the steering feels a little strange and springy. ESP breathes off the throttle before going to brakes. Slalom: Neutral up to a point, then oversteers on the limit. A bit roly-poly but it manages to hang on and remain controllable. Again, steering is precise/quick, but doesn't "feel" natural. Felt like it had an LSD because the exit was easy at wide-open throttle.


Vehicle: 2009 Audi A4 2.0T Quattro
Odometer: 4,732
Date: 12/30/08
Driver: Chris Walton
Price: $46,675

Specifications:
Drive Type: All-wheel drive
Transmission Type: 6-speed automatic
Engine Type: Inline-4
Displacement (cc/cu-in): 1,984cc (121 cu-in)
Redline (rpm): 6,800
Horsepower (hp @ rpm): 211 @ 5,500
Torque (lb-ft @ rpm): 258 @ 1,500
Brake Type (front): Ventilated disc
Brake Type (rear): Disc
Steering System: Electric speed-proportional power steering
Suspension Type (front): Independent, multilink
Suspension Type (rear): Independent, multilink
Tire Size (front): 245/40R18 93H
Tire Size (rear): 245/40R18 93H
Tire Brand: Pirelli
Tire Model: P6 Four seasons
Tire Type: All-season
Wheel Size: 18-by-8 inches
Wheel Material (front/rear): Alloy
As tested Curb Weight (lb): 3,770

Test Results:
0 - 30 (sec): 2.3
0 - 45 (sec): 4.0
0 - 60 (sec): 6.5
0 - 75 (sec): 9.6
1/4 Mile (sec @ mph): 14.7 @ 91.9
0-60 with 1-ft Rollout (sec): 6.2
30 - 0 (ft): 32
60 - 0 (ft): 123
Braking Rating: Average
Slalom (mph): 65.9
Skid Pad Lateral acceleration (g): 0.83
Handling Rating: Very Good
Db @ Idle: n/a
Db @ Full Throttle: n/a
Db @ 70 mph Cruise: n/a

Acceleration Comments: Like our long-term A4 Avant, this A4 doesn't like pedal overlap and stumbles off the line if there's too much of it. That said, I tried every combo of "Dynamic" ESP off, and D, S or M shift modes, and I cannot explain why this sedan is marginally slower than the Avant. It's still remarkably quick and still upshifts -- very hard -- about 500-1,000 rpm shy of redline at WOT.

Braking Comments: While the brake system feels up to the task, the all-season tires don't have the same bite as our Avant's summer tires. Decent pedal feel and fade resistance.

Handling Comments: Skid pad: Again with the tires, this A4 feels just as neutral and balanced as our Avant, but the grip just isn't there. Still, 0.83g ain't too shabby -- especially from an Audi with AWD. With ESP on, it steers from the front, and with ESP off it allows some rear slip that makes it steer more from the rear. Steering, though light, offers some feel, too. Slalom: Through the cones this A4 required diligent throttle control -- too much in/out made it under-/oversteer. Best to tiptoe in with maintenance throttle and go wide open for the exit to use the AWD. Again, light but precise steering was welcome. Very subtle corrections with ESP on -- not a total buzzkill.


How We Test: Behind the Numbers With the Inside Line Test Team


Categories: ,,,

29 Comments

invaliduser says:

05:01 PM, 06/23/09

wheel and tire size don't match on the A3

firstwagon says:

05:08 PM, 06/23/09

Bet that's why it was slower. The 17 inch rims couldn't grip the 18 inch tires.

stovt001 says:

05:25 PM, 06/23/09

I find it a real shame that the next GTI will have the same old 2.0T rather than the more powerful new one as found in the A4. It is even more disappointing since the competition is now around 250-260 hp/torque.

slickersdrip says:

06:53 PM, 06/23/09

stov,

More reason to lust after a GTD...

stovt001 says:

08:21 PM, 06/23/09

True. I really hope it comes stateside. Decently sport and insanely efficient? Count me in. Then it would just need a brake and suspension upgrade and I'd be set.

louiswei says:

09:15 PM, 06/23/09

$46,675 for the A4 2.0T!!!

What a waste...

ant14 says:

03:07 AM, 06/24/09

$46K? Wow, and some people were appalled with the Taurus SHO at $38K. I do agree though, it's overpriced and under powered for what it is...

johnnyr3 says:

03:08 AM, 06/24/09

@louiswei

I agree. And $34,520 for the A3 is just insane. I'll take a G37S instead of A4 and an MS3 instead of the A3 thank you very much.

I don't care how well manicured the interiors are in Audis. The performance and maintenance/reliability deficit between them and their comp is just too great.

sustainability says:

05:10 AM, 06/24/09

stovt001:

> I find it a real shame that the next GTI will
> have the same old 2.0T rather than the more
> powerful new one

stov:

> More reason to lust after a GTD...


Why? GTD offers by a mile less torque at wheels than the 2.0 TFSI.

I compared power curves for both engines, the 200HP 2.0 TFSI and 170HP 2.0 TDI, putting 0rpm and peak power rpm at exactly the same points. At absolutely every point of the rev range, be it 10% of the peak power revs, 20%, 50% or 100% the 170HP has much less pulling power than the 2.0 TFSI.

Just see the charts:
http://img29.imageshack.us/i/tfsivstdi.png/

Add in that the GTD is heavier and you'll get a car that simply will not deliver.


johnnyr3:

> I agree. And $34,520 for the A3 is just insane.

Especially when you consider this car is technically the same as the VW Golf.

So it's the 200HP Volkswagen Golf for 34k $. And people complained about 2010 Taurus prices.

ms3hothatch says:

05:12 AM, 06/24/09

The price must be a typo. There aren't that many crazy people out there that would pay more than $38,000 for a really tricked out Audi A4 2.0T and I mean really tricked out. Even in the low $30,000s it is still overpriced. It's only a 2.0T, which is a very common engine and no longer so special (not even the R20). Audi must make a killing in those cars (depending on the exchange rate of course). Even the 3.2 (discountinued for 2010) would be overpriced. One could get a new Mustang Shelby 500 for less and not the mention the long list of alternatives!

ba27 says:

05:44 AM, 06/24/09

I'll agree that the A3 is overpriced, though it is a nice car.

The A4 can be bought for under $35-40K if you go easy on the options, which isn't bad, IMO.

I had one as a loaner for a few days, and can confirm that the newest 2.0T engine is a real sweetheart. It's super responsive in the cut and thrust of normal traffic, and steps off the line very quickly with little throttle movement. I was AMAZED to find that the trans defaults to starting in 2nd gear during normal driving, but even more amazed that it's still really quick even in 2nd! The torque is hard to believe from such a small engine. Turbo+FSI FTW!

Also, everywhere I went, people commented on how great the car looked (Black over black, with some "deep-dish-style" mesh wheels).

It's the first A4 that I'd seriously consider as a replacement for my A6 2.7T.

audisport says:

06:12 AM, 06/24/09

The two prices are for pretty loaded examples. You have to check pretty much every box to get an A3 close to $40k. No, not a bargain but at $30k I think it's a good car. The A4 is just like any other entry premium/luxury car. You can have one in the $30's, but you can easily drive the price up to an insane number.

The argument can be made for many cars. "The Lincoln MK whatever is just a $50,000 Ford Taurus. The Lincoln MKZ is just a $40,000 Ford Fusion.

bestjinjo says:

07:16 AM, 06/24/09

You guys in US don't know how good you have it.

I live in Toronto, Canada and I can tell you the prices of cars in US are dirt cheap, especially leases. My mom got a 2008 A4 2.0T S-line Quattro Tiptronic with a sports packaage, sunroof, memory seats, etc. 2 years ago for $454 a month (w/ taxes in) on a 3-year lease with $0 down. You couldn't touch this price in Canada with a 100-foot pole.

Just because the sticker price comes to $x, does not mean that is what you will pay at the dealership.

I just went to www.audiusa.com and priced a 2.0T Quattro tiptronic 211hp, Sports Package (which includes 18" wheel with summer performance tires, Shift paddles (for Tiptronic models), Sport seats, Lumbar for both front seats, Sport steering wheel, Sport suspension), walnut wood inlays, heated front seats, rear side airbags, leather seating surfaces. Total Price:

$35,700 USD. So you can easily knock off $2 grand off that price at the dealership in this economy.

fst1 says:

07:44 AM, 06/24/09

FYI: A4 had the Prestige package, Audi Drive Select and Navigation. Prestige package is over $7K on its own, so yeah, it gets expensive quickly.

Ed Hellwig, Senior Editor, IL

ba27 says:

07:48 AM, 06/24/09

Thanks for the option info, Ed - that helps.

Now if Audi USA could just get their heads outta their a***s when it comes to spec-ing press vehicles, they might actually WIN the at the PR game. Sheesh!

estreka says:

08:48 AM, 06/24/09

Aren't luxury vehicles supposed to come with most of the frivolousness standard?

manuelc says:

12:19 PM, 06/24/09

That's why Acura does so well. Everything comes standard. Hassle-free.

wjtinatl says:

12:57 PM, 06/24/09

Comparing the A4 Quattro, 328xi and Passat CC VR6 4motion, the Audi really doesn'r fare too badly. MSRP on a A4 Premium Plus with Sport pkg. and Metallic paint is $39375, my local dealer is 3k off that without serious dickering. The 328xi if $45500 with same equipment, have not negotiated with BMW at all and the CC VR6 is $39960 without dickering. I've eliminated the VW because of shorter warranty and lack of sunroof and 5th seating position, but it looks the best, by far. Audi's inclusion of free maintenance for 2009 looks to sway the deal, but I am concerned about long term repair and resale value, two areas Audi historically does not fare well in. Looking at the Infiniti next, eliminated the Acura purely on styling basis, I just cannot spend 40k plus on a car I find outright ugly, unlike the previous generation.

roar02ram says:

01:41 PM, 06/24/09

wjtinatl - some people may scream blasphemy, and true it might not be the BEST choice around, but don't forget the Lexus IS250 AWD. It's cheap, good looking, & reliable, & it'll hold its value well.

ba27 says:

01:49 PM, 06/24/09

roar02ram - The IS250 has one (fatal, for me) flaw - it's SLOW. And it's slow in the worst possible way for American roads, in that it's seriously torque-deficient. The engine revs sweetly, and it's comfy inside, but it really needs mo powah.

charlesb says:

05:07 PM, 06/24/09

The market is just slipping away from VW/Audi.

The price structure of the whole lineup is getting out of whack with the market. A pretty well equipped A3 used to be pushing toward the upper twenty thousands and now that has risen up well into the the mid $30K range. Add in the DSG with Quattro (like most Audi aficionados want) and a few other goodies and you're looking at near forty grand near-luxury hatch. Which is quite insane, in my opinion.

Debunker says:

05:55 PM, 06/24/09

My 2009 A4 isn't much more than my '06 was, if you factor in things that are now standard. My '09 listed for around $36,500 with full maintenance included. The trick is to skip all the options. They drive the price up to absurd levels. Seriously, where else, for the money, can you get the speed, handling, interior quality, good looks, and all wheel drive for less? (BTW, I saw the Acura TL today and I expect I'll have a nightmare tonight!). Maybe you could choose an Infiniti Journey, but there's just something cheesy looking about the car. Looks like a grown up Altima.

acuras says:

10:12 PM, 06/24/09

Kind of cute comparison. I would do the A4 in a heartbeat. I had a rental A3 in Germany a year ago and its center console was basically destroyed. Didn't evoke images of quality. My 08 TT has the 2L engine and DSG and has been outstandingly good to me. I love the comments by posters on Acura. I also have an 04 tsx 6 speed which I still love, but that company is facing a huge wall, all of their own doing. Tacking a fishing lure onto the front of luxury vehicles is supposed to attract buyers?

rascal99 says:

09:59 AM, 06/25/09

"Tacking a fishing lure onto the front of luxury vehicles is supposed to attract buyers?"

Good one. I have enjoyed all the creative descriptions of the TL front-end (e.g. "guillotine grill", etc.). Those approving the new funky origami-inspired Acura designs should be fired. Now.

esf says:

11:25 AM, 06/26/09

"The market is just slipping away from VW/Audi. "

Right, that's why Audi's market share continues to grow (in the US and worldwide), and that's why VW threatened Toyota in almost becoming the world's largest automaker in the first quarter.

ahsanhuda says:

04:29 PM, 06/26/09

Name the best 4-cylinder car? Audi A4
Name the best 4-cylinder engine? Audi A4 2.0T

The prices listed are somewhat unrealistic, I paid 5K less than the MSRP last year for one.

redgeminipa says:

05:58 AM, 06/27/09

Hell, I paid almost $26k for a mid-level Jetta 2.5 (back in '06). Though, I do remember looking at the A3 on the lot next to it, and I can't say I remember the price being THAT much higher... maybe 4k more than my Jetta. If that would've been in my budget, I would've jumped on it.

charlesb says:

11:35 AM, 06/29/09

"Right, that's why Audi's market share continues to grow (in the US and worldwide), and that's why VW threatened Toyota in almost becoming the world's largest automaker in the first quarter."

The prices are out of whack with the product, so the perceived value isn't there, and even at these prices VW is dumping product (selling below home market prices) in the U.S market. GM was "the worlds largest automaker" not too long ago, so I'm thinking that things can change quickly.

igozoomzoom says:

04:20 PM, 07/ 6/09

I'd take the A3 over the A4 based on looks/utility alone, not to mention saving $10k!

But I'd have a much more difficult time choosing the A3 over the 2010 Golf/GTI 5-door!

Add a comment

Advertisement

Advertisement

Browse Archives