Acura TSX engine news

I see little reasoning why it's good news that the TSX would offer a V6. Someone care to explain that?

Mediocrity is right. Stick to the 4-cyl. Want to make a Type-S version? Then stick the K23t in it.

I'm actually (once again) extremely disappointed in Acura (Honda) given their past successful efforts in meeting and exceeding emission standards. Honda was known to challenge themselves when it came to environmentally responsible technology. With the i-DTEC "clean diesel" it seems as if they just gave up.

This is one of the many planned elements that could have helped Acura reach their goal of becoming global and being recognized as a tier 1 luxury brand.

As for the V6....I'm actually against it as it becomes another mid size sedan with a V6.Id say give it a updated version of the K23T (from the RDX) or a higher powered version of the current K24.

I'm sure there are those who would welcome a V6 option in this car—regardless of what our economy is doing. Besides, choice is good, no? If you don't like it, don't buy it.

Yeah, they could use the 2.3 turbo from the RDX, but not everyone wants a turbo, or are willing to put up with the usual extra maintenance.

Case in point: Toyota sells a lot of V6 RAV4s, whereas Subaru sells very few turbo Foresters.

While similar in terms of power, the Forester requires premium gas and should have the oil changed every 3K. Not so for the V6 RAV4. It offers similar performance with less hassle.

"Besides, choice is good, no? If you don't like it, don't buy it."
Though I agree with this statement in concept, in practice giving the TSX a V6 reduces choice. Why? Because as hondacura said the TSX will become just another mid size "luxury" sedan with a V6, mediocrity. Also, those who value efficient engines will be marginalized because all the other performance stuff will be packaged with the heavier, fuel swilling V6 option, like every other car.

"Yeah, they could use the 2.3 turbo from the RDX, but not everyone wants a turbo, or are willing to put up with the usual extra maintenance.

Rsholland, using the K23T from the RDX could spread a lot of the R&D/production costs and also keep the car from being another run of the mill mid size sedan. The maintenance requirements aren't much different (if any) from other premium vehicles, turbocharged or not, Acura or not. I don't think the required 3K oil changes and premium fuel requirements are looked at really closely in this segment.

"Case in point: Toyota sells a lot of V6 RAV4s, whereas Subaru sells very few turbo Foresters."

I understand your point Rsholland but RAV4 V6 buyers and Turbo Forester buyers (going by my experience with owners of both) are totally different. I would like to say the boosted Forester caters more to the enthusiasts, something with near WRX performance with extra utility. The RAV4 V6 is another run of the mill, vanilla compact "SUV" with a V6 option. Sure Subaru wont sell as many turbo Foresters vs Rav4 V6's but thats the point as its a unique niche product.

I never thought Id say this but Honda/Acura products are becoming more and more mainstream with each new generation. Honda, stick to your roots and PLEASE don't forget your slogan "The Power of Dreams".

The article seems to indicate that the manual transmission version does meet the requirements. Of course they'd never bring it over as manual only. Stupid automatics, ruining the fun for real drivers.

It appears that Honda is running into the same issues that every other manufacturer is running into. I don't know why anyone thought Honda was magic.

"It appears that Honda is running into the same issues that every other manufacturer is running into. I don't know why anyone thought Honda was magic."

Brn, its not that Honda was magic, Honda just isnt as enthusiastic as they used to be when it comes to overcoming engineering obstacles. The VCM system is another example of taking a short cut and coming up with mediocre results.

There are a lot of people on TOV that were really hoping to get our hands on a TSX i-DTEC and Acura (Honda) let us down (again).

I know VW offers a Jetta TDi, do they offer a manual version also?

+1 on the votes against the V-6 option. I think a turbo or high-output version of the existing 4 would make for a stellar Type-S, though, and a good companion to the TL Type-S.

I, for one, think that Honda needs to go back to it's 4-cylinder roots. I think with gas price uncertainty being the order of the day, there's a whole lot more receptiveness to a well-tuned 4-cylinder than there was say 5-years ago. Given that no one else does 4-cylinders as well as Honda does, Honda would be wise to flex its muscle here & deliver something class-leading.

"I, for one, think that Honda needs to go back to it's 4-cylinder roots. I think with gas price uncertainty being the order of the day, there's a whole lot more receptiveness to a well-tuned 4-cylinder than there was say 5-years ago. Given that no one else does 4-cylinders as well as Honda does, Honda would be wise to flex its muscle here & deliver something class-leading."

Exactly Roar! The K series engines can deliver much more power with just with bolt ons and a bit of ECU tuning so there isnt really any excuse for Honda not offering a hotter version of the K24 which was actually the original plan.

Ive personally seen 2.0L (K20) Civic Si's (boltons/IPS cams/Hondata K-Pro) lay down 235+hp TO THE WHEELS with a healthy serving of torque. Keep in mind those are "light" mods with NO loss in realiability and can still pass smog testing.

The K24 wont pull like the K20 up top but they do have a fatter torque curve and are highly capable engines. Id like to see a TSX "Sport" (it isnt enough to be a Type S) 2.4L with 230hp/175-180ftlbs and a 6MT/LSD. Id easily purchase that car over a V6 TSX.

Acura also has to consider that BMW and Mercedes will have 4cyl versions of their 3 and C models available here in the next couple of years. I say offer the base TSX 2.4 a TSX 2.4 Sport and the TSX i-DTEC.

"I know VW offers a Jetta TDi, do they offer a manual version also?"

That was supposed to say "automatic version also".

I get flip-flopping on the diesel issue, but right now gas costs $2.849 and diesel was a shocking $3.999 at the nearest station. That sort of defeats the purpose, at least until diesel prices drop.

I think the new TDI you have either a 6-speed manual or a 6-speed DSG?