Home

Straightline

The car enthusiasts news blog from Inside Line

First Drive: 2008 Chevrolet Malibu

2008 Chevrolet Malibu

Inside Line went to Tennessee to drive the all-new 2008 Chevy Malibu. It's the most important car of the year for General Motors.

Do you think it can compete with market leaders like the Honda Accord and Toyota Camry?

Read the Malibu First Drive on Inside Line.

2008 Chevrolet Malibu

Donna DeRosa, Managing Editor

Categories:

16 Comments

billt9 says:

12:21 PM, 11/ 2/07

It can beat the Camry.
It's not even close to the Accord's league. In price and luxury.
 
This car is a great bargain for those who just need a car, and one that doesn't drive them insane with super cheapness and crampiness.
 
With its 0-60 in 9.3 seconds, GM joins in the push for fuel economy over power, gradually changing American minds.

SubyTrojan says:

04:30 PM, 11/ 2/07

Yes, I think it definitely can compete! :o) Beware the Bow-tie, everyone!

gogreen2 says:

05:50 PM, 11/ 2/07

I sat in the new Malibu at the Seattle auto show. It feels solid. However, the material they used for the steering wheel has a somewhat rough feel, not really smooth. Otherwise, its a very clean looking, good design inside and out.

orangutan says:

06:41 PM, 11/ 2/07

The rear end in that second photo reminds me of the Buick Lucerne.

daytona_500 says:

07:45 PM, 11/ 2/07

I'm surprised Chevy isnt offering a nav system. To me its not a deal breaker and it really shouldnt be for anyone. But to be fully competitive with Honda and Toyota and Nissan they should match them feature for feature.
 
But in all fairness to Chevy, I will say almost all Camrys and Accords I see dont have one, so I guess it wont really hurt them.

hondacura4 says:

08:59 PM, 11/ 2/07

This car is very attractive as its not over or understyled. Seems like the quality is there. Going by the pics but I have a few things I dont like. #1 that GM steering wheel is TOO BIG. #2 The rear of the car doesnt go with the rest of the design which is pleasing. #3 That GM center stack, seems like GM has all this room to place buttons but they dont use it. The buttons seem so .........scrunched up and it leaves a lot of bland plastic just lying there.
 
I love the GM signature grill and headlights. The greenhouse is a combination of the Aura and Acura TL which is good. But the rear lights just let the car down. Looks like this car may generate some REAL sales numbers. Good job GM!

estreka says:

12:31 AM, 11/ 3/07

This should be a big move for Chevy as long as they learn from the shortcomings of the Aura.

stovt001 says:

05:33 AM, 11/ 3/07

As far as nav, GM expects its On Start turn by turn directions to fill that role. I say just get an aftermarket stand-alone system, as they are better and much cheaper than the factory installed systems anyway, and it can go with you when you go from car to car anyway. It will be interesting to see if the lack of a true built in nav system hurts sales. It would be a real pity if it did.

daytona_500 says:

08:16 AM, 11/ 3/07

I cant imagine a lack of a nav system really hurting sales, because I honestly cant remember the last time I saw a midsize sedan with navigation. If this was a luxury car GM would be screwed but I think they'll do fine.
 
I agree with the portable nav system part, that makes a lot of sense.

cah11705 says:

09:07 AM, 11/ 3/07

And if for some odd reason it hurts sales they could have a promotion where they can give away a portable nav system with certain cars
so no big deal for GM
 
as for the rest of the car, i think it looks great
a lot more upscale looking than the camry and altima
and right up there with the new accord
personally i think this is even better looking than the new accord
finally, GM got it right

kurtamaxxxguy says:

05:21 PM, 11/ 4/07

Interesting that the new 'bu is based on the now-deceased Maxx chassis (also used for the Aura), A pity Chevy or Saturn found no way to viably market the hatch/wagon version for '08.

mirth says:

11:03 AM, 11/ 5/07

Seen one in person: interior is wonderful, exterior leaves me cold (or worse, sleepy).

flicmod says:

11:59 AM, 11/ 5/07

I'm not sold on the exterior styling. I think the grille is WAY too large for its design and the taillights do NOT fit at all. Not to mention the insanely wide C-pillar.
 
The interior, however, is wonderful. It looks like they've refined the Aura's interior for the 'Bu. The Aura is just better looking.

stovt001 says:

12:05 PM, 11/ 5/07

I like the large grill, but I have to agree the rear lights look a bit odd. I sat in the car and the large C pillars didn't seem to hurt visibility much, but I'd have to drive it to really tell.

desmolicious says:

05:58 PM, 11/ 5/07

This is a really nice looking car IMO. I am surprised and impressed.

66fastback says:

10:11 AM, 11/20/07

Maybe it's just me, but I don't see what the problem is with the taillights. The thing I like about them is that they look different from the other models, which gives this car distinction. G.M., as well as the other manufacturers have been making badge engineered cars for far too long. Personally, I like being able to look at a car and be able tell exactly what it is without having to look at the Company emblem. If I have a complaint about the Malibu, it's that the front end looks too much like a re-badged Saturn! The new grille is great compared to Chevrolet grilles of only three years ago (the monsterous chrome band that traversed the front of the car like a mis-placed chrome bumper), but the headlights are the same as the Saturn. They should be different.
 
The rest of the car looks great to me. I've been a Chrysler guy for the last 15 years. Switched over from G.M. because of the bland styling, uncomfortable seats and mediocre performance in G.M. products, but I'm seriously considering coming back with the Malibu, as long as the performance is there. There are only 3-4 Chrysler products I'd even consider buying right now.
 
I'm a little different. I don't drive with my foot in the tank, but I still like a car that accelerates briskly when necessary, and handles well ALONG WITH decent fuel economy. I don't think that fuel economy and performance should, or must be mutually exclusive.

Add a comment

Advertisement

Latest Poll

What was your favorite Super Bowl XLVI Commercial?

Advertisement

Tip the Editors

Got a breaking news tip for the Inside Line editors?

Send it to tips@edmunds.com

Browse Archives