Home

Long-Term Road Tests

Daily updates on our fleet of cars and trucks

1994 Mazda Miata: Suspension Walkaround

1994_Miata_1600_sus_oa_lead.jpg 

A lot of car people really admire the original Mazda Miata because it's such a simple and well-executed design. But there are also those who'll never get it. I heard one myself last week while I was driving our '94 Miata with the top down: "Look at that. That car is so bleeping blay."

Whatever, dude. I call I can say is you're missing out. He probably assumes it's front-wheel drive, too.

Let's move along. I'll point out Jay's bolt-on mods along the way.

 

1994_Miata_1600_sus_fr_larm_fr_a2.jpg

The secret of the Miata's success is the fact that it is, in fact, a lightweight rear-drive roadster with double wishbone suspension.

A heavier L-shaped lower arm (yellow) handles the bulk of the suspension loads, and a lighter A-shaped upper arm (green) helps define the steering axis and the caster and camber angles.

Because the engine drives the rear wheels, there's room for a front-mounted steering rack that's mounted ahead (white) of the front axle centerline. Steering precision benefits as a result.

The original springs and shocks were coil-overs too, but the lower spring perch was welded in place and the springs and shocks were considerably softer. I measured the springs on my 1990 Miata once, and they came out at 130 lb/in. These springs are considerably stiffer at 425 lb/in. Part of the increase provides a sportier ride via a higher ride frequency. But there is a practical aspect, too. If you lower a car, the springs must be stiffer in order to absorb the same amount of energy over a shorter distance.

The yellow Bilstein shocks are monotube units, whereas the original dampers were a twin-tube design. As the name implies, monotube shocks are made of a single tube, and that allows any internally-generated heat to wick out easily. Twin tube shocks have a tube within a tube, and that makes them store heat, like a thermos bottle. It also makes for a smaller diameter valve because it runs in the innermost tube. Both of these factors, taken together, limits the amount of damping they can produce without fade.  

 

 

1994_Miata_1600_sus_fr_larm_rr_a.jpg 

Here's another view of the upper and lower arms.

The outer ball joint (black) is easily replaceable because it is bolted on to the end of the lower arm.

 

 

1994_Miata_1600_sus_fr_det_larm_a.jpg 

Here's another view of the L-shaped lower arm. Both inner pivots (yellow) are made up of eccentric cams.

Good news: camber and caster are both adjustable.

Bad news: it's a pain in the butt to adjust because each affects the other. Loosely speaking, the front one primarily affects camber and the rear one primarily affects caster. Also, the pivot bolts aren't particularly huge. If you run over an apex curb on a track day, things can move and your alignment may readjust itself to a setting you'd rather not have. Same goes for potholes.

 

 

1994_Miata_1600_sus_fr_det_sprgbump.jpg 

Here you can see one of the potential pitfalls of aftermarket coil-over springs with adjustable spring perches. Springs flex a little to the side as they compress, and the outside diameter of the threaded collar can be somewhat close to the inside diameter of the spring.

These rub marks (green) tell the tale. You can hear it, too. Some aftermarket spring sellers (Ground Control comes to mind) offer barrel-shaped springs that provide clearance in this critical area. The rubbing and the noise isn't a huge deal for a race car (my Miata rally car squeaked like you wouldn't believe), but it's less than ideal for street coil-over applications like this. 

 

 

1994_Miata_1600_sus_fr_det_stab_a.jpg 

A much larger Racing Beat stabilizer bar has been fitted, but it bolts into the stock location. A larger bar requires a larger bushing to pivot in, and the red color of this one indicates that it's urethane, not rubber.

This stab bar is hollow to save weight, but that doesn't affect its torsional stiffness as much as you'd think because the outer extremes of the cross-section is where most of the work is done. The torsional stiffness of a stab bar is proportional to its outside diameter to the FOURTH power (OD^4). The torsional stiffness of a hollow bar is proportional to OD^4-ID^4

Our old stock front stab bar was 19 mm in diameter -- about 0.75 inches. This racing beat bar is 1.125 inches in diameter on the outsdie and 0.875 inches in diameter on the inside. Do the math using the fourth power of those diameters and you'll see that this stabilizer bar is 3.25 times stiffer than the stock unit.

You can actually see that it's a hollow bar by the way it looks at the end where it's squished flat. For the record, Racing Beat says it weighs 5.5 pounds.

 

 

1994_Miata_1600_sus_fr_det_stablink.jpg 

The original fixed-length stabilizer bar links have been replaced here by adjustable ones. But you don't really need to adjust something like this.

The idea behind them is that fixed-length links might lead to a little stabilizer bar preload. That's no big deal on the street, but it can matter on the track. So what you'd do is get the car set up and aligned, get the driver and the fuel installed and then have a friend or crewmember adjust the length of these links to remove the preload. One of the heim ends is left-hand thread and the other is right hand thread, so you don't need to remove them for adjustment. Simply loosen the thing jamb nuts and then twirl the black center section to the desired length.

If the word "crewmember" doesn't apply to you then the word "adjustable" probably doesn't either.

However, the fact that these links have spherical heim ends instead of rubber bushings is something a street enthusiast might appreciate.

 

 

1994_Miata_1600_sus_fr_det_brk.jpg 

No, "R" isn't for rear. There are the stock right-front brake calipers on our Miata. They're single-piston sliding calipers and cast-iron ventilated rotors. Simple, but very effective. Easily upgraded for track use with aftermarket pads.

 

 

1994_Miata_1600_sus_rr_oa_up.jpg 

Our back, the first-gen Miata has another pair of upper and lower wishbones. And we've got another colorful coil-over replacement, too.

 

 

1994_Miata_1600_sus_rr_larm_rr.jpg 

Like the front, the lower arm is the higher-stressed one that does most of the heavy lifting. By the look of it, the spring/shock arm ratio might be 0.80, but its lean angle takes some of that away. The tiny paperclip of a rear stabilizer bar (yellow) operates at something like a 0.60 motion ratio. We haven't upsized this one yet because the car feels balanced as it sits.

But it looks like we could trim the ends off those stab link bolts to save some weight. :)

 

 

1994_Miata_1600_sus_rr_larm_fr.jpg 

There's nothing much to see here but 177,000 miles of baked-on road grime.

 

 

1994_Miata_1600_sus_rr_det_larm.jpg 

Another lower control arm, another pair of alignment adjustment bolts. Move these to adjust camber. Make sure they're tight.

 

 

1994_Miata_1600_sus_rr_det_braces.jpg 

My 1990 and 1991 Miatas did not come with these braces, but our '94 came with them stock. I think they were added whan the engine size was upped from 1.6 liters to 1.8 liters. Whatever, they're a good upgrade to consider.

The lower arms connect to horns on the rear sub-frame that hang down. The longitudinal braces (yellow) tie them together and to the unibody, and the later one (green) stiffens things up side-to-side. Since most of the lateral suspension loads go through the lower control arms to these horns, these stiffening braces are potentially huge if you add lots of horsepower and lots of tire, like we plan to do.

 

 

1994_Miata_1600_sus_rr_det_brk.jpg 

Braking duties are carried out by single-piston sliding calipers and solid cast iron rotors. The calipers and pads are the same as my 1.6-liter car, but the rotor diameter is larger, and the larger moment arm that represents allows them to apply more torque.

 

 

1994_Miata_1600_sus_fr_det_tireweight.jpg 

This is probably the lightest wheel/tire combo you're likely to see on stock wheels, and the low unsprung weight they represent is another secret to the Miata's success. That's what you get with 185/60R14 tires on light 14" factory alloys. The larger 949-Racing 9x15 wheels we've put on since are supposed to be no heavier than the stock wheels here. With tires, who knows? We'll see.

 

Dan Edmunds, Director of Vehicle Testing @ 177,362 miles

Categories: ,

23 Comments

hybris says:

07:59 PM, 06/25/10

This thing needs a big brake kit.

subytrojan says:

08:42 PM, 06/25/10

Sweet write-up, Dan!

mrjost55 says:

08:48 PM, 06/25/10

@hybris: that will destroy all of the benefits of low unsprung weight

diondi says:

10:03 PM, 06/25/10

@mrjost55 Not if they're properly designed big brake kits with light 2-piece rotors.

@Dan can we get a walkaround of the GTI? Pretty pleaseeee?

stovt001 says:

10:38 PM, 06/25/10

Simple and lightweight count for a lot - no electro-adjustable-magnetic gadgets, no gimmicks, but it just simply works so well.

actualsize says:

11:37 PM, 06/25/10

@diondi. Don't worry. It's on the short list!

clarkma5 says:

12:39 AM, 06/26/10

The '92 added the rear subframe brace, though that was changed in '94 along with the addition of the front subframe brace and the brace between the seatbelts.

my90 says:

08:04 AM, 06/26/10

When does the Rotex go on ?

inlinesix says:

08:24 AM, 06/26/10

"He probably assumes it's front-wheel drive, too."

Ive had a similar experience with some "educated" auto guys. I was listening to a couple employees at an auto parts shop commenting on my old turbo IS300 sitting outside. One guy said "dude thats a sweet car...too bad its front wheel drive"

firstwagon says:

09:40 AM, 06/26/10

Very nice.

It really shows you don't need complicated and expensive if you have lightweight and well designed.

cruiserhead1 says:

10:53 AM, 06/26/10

Looks like a fun project car! Mechanically attractive to play with.

A friend used to own a Monster Miata (remember those?) and we did burnouts @ 50mph
The car couldn't take the tq and broke a lot of stuff but it was a fun ride.

on the coilovers:
how about grinding down that side of the threads flat, cleaning up the edge of the threads for clearance.
still able to spin the adjuster and clear the coil.
A bit worried the wear could contribute to a cracked coil?

csubowtie says:

11:07 AM, 06/26/10

Are there any cures for the eccentric bolts rotating and how big of an issue is this for a track/autocross car?

joshg_5 says:

06:40 PM, 06/26/10

This is a great article!

I just want to let you know that your endeavor of taking on this project inspired me to buy a '95 Miata with 160K. Don't regret it for a second...

Keep posting up these as much as you can, they're great.

Thanks

PS: I get the same comments that you mentioned at the beginning. But it only makes me laugh at their ignorance, and what they're missing out on

fundango says:

08:04 PM, 06/26/10

Man, I really love the suspension design of this Miata. Simple but effective double-wishbones in the front and in rear. Lightweight tire/wheel combo. Cheap. Ah, the good ol days =)

kyolml says:

12:28 AM, 06/28/10

Lager wheel with same weight will have more gyroscopic force, so still drag down power a bit...

chochmastergen says:

09:03 AM, 06/28/10

You're just as elitist as that guy for disparaging him for not liking the Miata. I know everyone on this site loves the Miata, but honestly its one of the worst looking cars I've ever seen. It might be the best drive you've ever had, but really some people put a lot of stock in how a car looks. That doesn't mean that "he doesn't get it," but maybe its just not his thing, to drive a car that looks like hell, regardless of how nice it drives.

smilespeed3 says:

09:17 AM, 06/28/10

@choch

Exactly what about the miata is offensive styling wise? Particularly the NA? Some could argue it's boring, or lacks masculinity in design, but I can't see anything about the car that downright offends.

We're not talking Aztecs here.

jederino says:

11:23 AM, 06/28/10

@Smile and Coch, I saw a Mazdaspeed Miata a couple days ago, and I think I like that generation best. It has a little bit of curve to the body panels that I find pleasing. But, I understand those may also be when the pork started to add up, relatively speaking. But, I get it when people don't like the looks. My wife hates the looks, and forbade me from considering one. So, if I did get one, it would be in spite of the looks.

Great post. Simple, inexpensive and good will always have a place in my book.

actualsize says:

11:49 AM, 06/28/10

@chochmastergen: I'm not sure it can be called "elitism" when the car in question costs a few grand. I just think it's a shame that there are people out there that are missing out on one of the most entertaining, bang-for-the-buck, easily modified drives around because it somehow compromises their machismo and/or doesn't come from a heritage-encrusted marque. There's gold under those allegedly "girl-y" fenders.

firstwagon says:

12:31 PM, 06/28/10

"but honestly its one of the worst looking cars I've ever seen."

"but maybe its just not his thing, to drive a car that looks like hell, regardless of how nice it drives."

Worst looking? looks like hell?

Are you serious?

I know appearance is subjective but the Miata is great looking modern interpretation of the classic roadster. It msy not be everyones choice for a daily driver but to say it looks like hell is wrong.

What do you think looks good?

hurls65 says:

11:49 AM, 07/ 2/10

I've owned mine since 1989, so I guess I've got a horse in this race... but I don't understand the "worst looking" thing either. It's no thing of beauty, but it's nothing if not inoffensive.

De gustibus non disputatum est, I guess

jay_laz says:

05:33 PM, 07/ 4/10

smilespeed3> We're not talking Aztecs here.

Would this be a good time to suggest a "Monster Aztec" project car?

> "but honestly its one of the worst looking cars I've ever seen."

You're probably right, compared to a 2012 Lambo Jota:

http://www.edmunds.com/lamborghini/jota/2012/index.html

Is the extra "pretty" worth an extra US$473,500?

fatcatm1 says:

09:34 PM, 08/ 9/11

A bit late in commenting but for future reference, we are using shorter coilover sleeves on our builds now, to prevent any potential rubbing (and save weight!). Optimization continues!

Shaikh

Add a comment

Advertisement

Latest Poll

My next car will have:

Advertisement

Tip the Editors

Got a breaking news tip for the Inside Line editors?

Send it to tips@edmunds.com

Awards

min's Best of the Web award

Past Vehicles

Browse Archives