Home

Long-Term Road Tests

Daily updates on our fleet of cars and trucks

Guest Mini E Blogger: 30,000 Miles in 11 Months. What Electric Leash?

mini-e-250-naunas.jpg
Photo courtesy of Peter Rigaud

This post was written by Tom Moloughney, who you all know by now drives Mini E #250. He has passed the 30,000-mile mark in his Mini E and may be the only person in the world to put that many miles on an EV in a single year. Here is his latest update. -- Donna DeRosa, Managing Editor

Eleven months to the day I took possession of Mini E #250 I watched the odometer turn past 30,000 miles. That's something I never expected to happen when I first got the car.

Back in December Dan Edmunds did a great suspension walkaround post. He wrote "the electronic leash and city-only suitability of the Mini E makes it unlikely that anyone could put more than 10,000 miles per year on this car." I was taken back a bit by the comment because at the time I had almost 18,000 miles on mine and knew of at least six others that already had over 10K on their cars.

However, I can understand his thoughts on this. While they do have a proper 220v charger at the Edmunds office, when the LTRT editors take the car for a few days they have to use the 110v emergency charger which takes forever to charge the car. This method is not practical and makes it very difficult to really drive the car much. All of the trial lease participants have 220v chargers at their homes and many others have a second charger at another location, like their place of work, as I do. This wouldn't be possible for everyone, but I think a good amount of people could make the arrangements to do something similar if they wanted to. I'm sure many employers, especially big corporations, would install chargers in their employee parking lots if there were a need for them. They don't cost much to install or use and the company would get good PR for supporting environmentally friendly transportation.

I believe having the ability to charge at work has increased my mileage by 20%. I could have lived with only the home charger, though, as my round trip commute is between 65 and 85 miles depending on the route I take. With the second charger I can now plug in when I arrive at work, and in about an hour I'm back at 100 percent. So I can drive around all I want and not worry about the range at all.

mini-e-250-action.jpg 
Photo courtesy of Peter Rigaud

When I first took possession of my Mini E eleven months ago, I really had no idea what to expect. Would it spend more time getting fixed than on the road? Would it lose power going up long inclines? Would the range decrease as time passed? Would I regret doing this?

Well, eleven months and 30,000 miles later I can answer those questions with a big NO.

The car has seen its fair time being repaired. Twice it needed new battery modules and once I hit a famous New Jersey pothole and messed up a whole bunch of stuff in the front end but I can hardly blame the car for that. I was going about 55 mph and practically tore the front right wheel off.

More photos and story after the jump...

mini-e-250-tile.jpg

I have used the car for everything from commuting, to delivering food for my restaurant to (over)loading it with 800 pounds of tile when I remodeled my bathroom. It has proven to be a competent workhorse that hasn't let me down.

Mini has offered the option of renewing our leases for another year for $600 per month and I accepted. The end of the second year will coincide with the beginning of a new program similar to this one. The car will be an all-electric BMW called the ActiveE and will be far more advanced than the Mini E in terms of technology. The Mini E drivers who continue for a second year will have the first option of getting an ActiveE and I plan to get one for sure.

Some facts at 30,000 miles

Average Observed Range Per Charge:
Temps above 60: 108
Temps 40-60: 90
Temps 20-40: 85
Temps below 20: 72

Number of times I drove the car past "0" on the charge meter: 46
Number of times I charged the car: 538
Average trip mileage between charges: 56
Most miles driven past "0" on the charge meter: 18
Most miles driven in a single week: 1,004
Most miles driven in a single day: 204
Most miles driven on a single charge: 128
Repairs needed: 3
Days in for scheduled service and repairs: 50

mini-e-250-odometer.jpg

Categories: ,

29 Comments

bankerdanny says:

01:32 PM, 05/14/10

Great update Tom. As always, tons of useful info.

jeepsrt says:

01:36 PM, 05/14/10

How much has it cost you to charge?

tomm250 says:

01:42 PM, 05/14/10

Banker: Thank you ;)

Jeepsrt: About $3.00 to charge a completely discharged battery. Or about 3 cents per mile average

prndlol says:

02:22 PM, 05/14/10

That's about $900 for "fuel" to travel roughly two and a half years worth of typical driving distance.

$360 a year or a buck a day. Now if only the added tech didn't cost more than $20,000 we'd be all set for the future...

saxdogg says:

02:56 PM, 05/14/10

Am I the only one who thinks it's wild to pay $600/month to drive and guinea pig a car for some company? Why wouldn't they lend it to you and just make you write reports etc. to test it out.

ed124c says:

03:10 PM, 05/14/10

Since he uses it for business, there is probably a good tax break. Other than that, I agree.

For us mere mortals, at this point in time, the Mini-E is totally impractical. In a few more years-- who knows? What we do know is we need to "reduce our dependance on foreign oil." A statement that is so overused that people are tired of hearing it. But it is more valid now than it was almost 40 years ago, when the word Ayatollah was on everyones lips as they sat in long gas lines. How little we have learned and how much time we have lost.

knitbeanie says:

03:24 PM, 05/14/10

"saxdogg says:

02:56 PM, 05/14/10

Am I the only one who thinks it's wild to pay $600/month to drive and guinea pig a car for some company? Why wouldn't they lend it to you and just make you write reports etc. to test it out."

because how else would hipsters be able to show off their eco-cred?

i love how his blogs about how it can hold heavy tile boxes...
how much easier would it be if you drove a regular mini and could load them in the back hatch?
then you wouldnt have to act like your cars ability to hold them was some magical/mythical feat, when in reality most any car could hold the tiles.

mcgs999 says:

03:26 PM, 05/14/10

50 days in the shop?!? yikes...

felonious says:

03:37 PM, 05/14/10

Knitbeanie: $0.03/mile is the answer to everything you wrote.

throwback says:

05:08 PM, 05/14/10

Thanks for the update. It will be interesting to see how much of the current tech ends up in the Megacity

tomm250 says:

05:27 PM, 05/14/10

Throwback: From what I understand almost nothing from the MINI-E will end up in the Megacity vehicle. The ActiveE that will be introduced next June will have most of the hardware and electronics that will be used in the Megacity. The drivetrain in the MINI-E was made by a AC Propulsion. This will not be used in future BMW EV's as they want to design and build their own drivetrain specifically made for the vehicle.

knitbeanie: I never claimed this car could haul around more than any other car. In fact it can probably fit less inside than just about any car other than some small two seat sports cars. I was just explaining how the car has suited my needs just fine and that I don't "baby" it. I beat it up as much as I can, I'm not responsible for anything that breaks on it so why not?

mcgs999: yeah 50 days is a lot. However I was given a loaner and received refunds for the time it was out of service.

minie183 says:

07:25 PM, 05/14/10

knitbeanie,

friend, you are way out of line.

This is not about eco-cred.

Its about a moon shot. It's about a light bulb. It's about a Digital Operating Sytem (MS-DOS.) It's about a kite, a glider, with a new invention called an internal combustion motor straped on its wings. It's about a cure for polio........It's about independence from hostile govenments........it's about self reliance......its about cleaner air......and it's about progressing our planet beyond oil.

It's about leadership, inititaive and risk.

If you think the electric car efforts are not worthwhile, I would simple ask that your breath the exhaust of your own vehicle first in the cabin (first hand smoke) before venting it out your tailpipe to the rest of us. (second hand smoke)

We can and should do so much better.

Thanks Tom for a great post.


Cheers
Peder
Mini-E #183 14.500 miles.

anthonylam66 says:

07:43 PM, 05/14/10

Another great post Tom. I thoroughly enjoy your posts and insights. You are able to give a perspective on the car that the IL editors simply cannot by driving the car a few days here and there.

I am looking forward to the day that I can walk into any automobile showroom and have a choice of both gasoline powered and electric cars and I don't think we are very far from that being a reality.

Hopefully advancements in battery technology will bring the range of these cars up to 150 to 200 miles because that would make the cars infinitely more valuable.

knitbeanie says:

07:59 PM, 05/14/10

"minie183 says:

07:25 PM, 05/14/10
Its about a moon shot. It's about a light bulb. It's about a Digital Operating Sytem (MS-DOS.) It's about a kite, a glider, with a new invention called an internal combustion motor straped on its wings. It's about a cure for polio........It's about independence from hostile govenments........it's about self reliance......its about cleaner air......and it's about progressing our planet beyond oil.

It's about leadership, inititaive and risk.

If you think the electric car efforts are not worthwhile, I would simple ask that your breath the exhaust of your own vehicle first in the cabin (first hand smoke) before venting it out your tailpipe to the rest of us. (second hand smoke)""

why would i force myself to breath un-cut exhaust? i dont see how that is the same thing as your "second-hand smoke"...

your viewpoint is vastly different than mine, thats alright, we can all have our own opinions...
but dont wax poetic about it being some cure for polio or crap, you my "friend" are way out of line comparing those accomplishments to the mini-e.

please dont tell me that i am part of your collective "we", and have to do better.

minie183 says:

08:24 PM, 05/14/10

Knitbeanie,

it's all good, thanks for calling it poetry, I was referring to man's ability to progress, invent and to find solutions.

Diversity is to be celebrated including diverse opinion.

we can do better, in our own independent ways of course :)

http://www.heronshouse.com

Cheers
Peder


mikegrahamjr says:

11:41 PM, 05/14/10

Tom,

I wanted more info on your 3c a mile numbers. When i calculate my monthly draw for #269 and i run that against the 2 different charges that I am billed for my home electricity, I am getting a number much closer to 8c/mile. Still better than gasoline, but nowhere near 3c. Are you getting some different rate at work that is pulling this number down? What is your number only based on your home charger use?

Mike #269

firstwagon says:

01:11 AM, 05/15/10

Seems to me reducing pollution to next to nothing and cutting the dependence on oil is close to a cure for polio. Countless people die every year for air pollution.

knitbeanie says:

02:03 AM, 05/15/10

" firstwagon says:

01:11 AM, 05/15/10

Seems to me reducing pollution to next to nothing and cutting the dependence on oil is close to a cure for polio. Countless people die every year for air pollution."

uhm, how many lives do you think the polio vaccines' invention saved?
how many lives do you think the 500 mini-es have saved?

i'd say that one number is alot smaller than the other...

these 500 cars arent cutting dependence on oil beyond a MINI-SCULE scale (yes, i am punny)
what good are these cars if they arent widely available and affordable (along with other current drawbacks)

you can compare them to the polio vaccine when they are available on the scale and at the cost etc of the polio vaccine.

until then, they are just toys.

anthonylam66 says:

06:00 AM, 05/15/10

Knitbeanie: firstwagon and mini183 aren't trying to say the mini-e is as great an accomplishment as a cure for Polio that's obvious. The mini-e obviously hasn't saved any lives and isn't even the best electric car our there today. What I'm sure they were trying to get across is it's part of the movement to electrics, a beginning of the biggest development and change the auto industry has ever seen. A change that will dramatically improve the quality of air we breathe, so much so there will be health benefits for everyone especially those that live in congested urban areas.

The mini-e certainly isn't going to be responsible for all that, but it is a piece of the puzzle that is getting us one step closer to one auto maker, BMW putting an electric car in their showrooms for sale. All of the major manufacturers are currently working on an electric car that they will sell soon. This IS the beginning of something really big.

moreau says:

10:39 AM, 05/15/10

Remember that electric vehicles are only as clean as the powerplant that charges them.

Anyways, I must commend you on your bravery. 11 months, about 330 days... 50 of which in the shop... so 30,000 miles / 280 days -> 107 miles a day, assuming you never skipped weekends. Though there may be a hint of madness in selecting an electric vehicle with a maximum listed range of less than your average daily usage...

Still not sold on the concept. Hybrids are a much greater reward for the cost, since minimal amounts of batteries are required and you still take advantage of the two greatest gains in efficiency (for city driving) of auto-off and regenerative braking without range restrictions. The efficiencies are also more comparable than you might think: average coal power plants are 33.1% efficient (thermal -> electric http://www.netl.doe.gov/energy-analyses/pubs/Impr_Effcy_of_CFPP_CO2_Redctns_1109.pdf). The faux-Atkinson cycle engine the Prius uses has a peak thermal->mechanical efficiency of 37%, with average efficiency in the 30-35% range (http://www.transportation.anl.gov/pdfs/HV/2.pdf). Factor in transmission/charging/mechanical losses, and they're pretty damn close, if not directly in favor of the Prius. With only ~28% of US electrical supply NOT coming from hydrocarbons, it's a wash between the options in terms of efficiency (depends on where you live really).

We can figure out battery technology while we're building hybrids. It makes more sense for the next 15 years to focus on hybrids and building nuclear powerplants/renewable energy.

firstwagon says:

11:13 AM, 05/15/10

moreau has a good point. Far too much of the US electricity comes from dirty fuels to make electric cars truly clean. However the problem doesn't lie with the electric cars, it lies with power industry. That's where the government should really pushing research right now.

In the meanwhile electric cars should be promoted most in areas that use the most green power. For example where I live (British Columbia) over 90% of over power is clean (hydro).

For obvious reasons that solution won't work everywhere but each area will likely have a cleaner method of generating power that works for them. Even if it's just switching to natural gas it would still be much cleaner the using coal. They should have a plan to eliminate coal power plants by a certain date in the same way they are pushing higher mpg standards and lower emission cars.

I'm not a fan of nuclear (costs and risks are too high) but there are countless ways to generate electricity.

tomm250 says:

11:24 AM, 05/15/10

Hey Mike,

I'm not being 100% scientific with my cost per mile. I don't have a separate meter for the charging which would be the best way to do it. I'm basing it on a couple things. For the first 5 months when I got the car last year and only had my home charger, I was exclusively charging at home and was driving roughly 100 miles per day. My electric bill was almost exactly $100 per month more than the same months of the previous year and we didn't change anything else in the house, so it should be fair to say the car was costing me about $100 to drive roughly 3,000 miles.
Now it's much more complicated because I charge at work some and at home some. Plus at home I have the solar electric system so my electricity bill is almost nothing. The car has a 35 kwh pack but of that only 28 is usable and I don't think that running the car to zero on the charge meter will even use the full28kwh. I think you can drive it about 15-20 miles before the full 28 is used so driving the car 100 miles probably uses closer to 25kwh. I'm paying about .12 per kWh at work so that would be $3.00 per 100 miles.
The national average for electricity per kwh is $.10, although it's higher here on the Northeast.

Now you get into the real complicated part and that's how efficiently you drive. What is your usual Ah/100 miles? I'm usually in in the 50's or 60's but can get in the 40's if I'm doing all city, low speed driving. In those cases I get 120 miles/charge. In the winter with the heater on and driving at 70 mph I have seen it in the 90's so I'm sure it was costing me 5 or 6 cents per mile in those instances. But I don't know how it could be 8 cents like you are getting unless you're driving like the MINI'S in the Italian Job did. ; )

Stop by the restaurant some time if you get near Montclair.

Tom

siarizona says:

03:04 PM, 05/15/10

Thanks for the post, Tom, and for being willing to do this test. It's a step, a first step, in the technologic effort to reduce our dependence on fossil fuels. We have a long way to go, but steps like this are necessary.

hybris says:

06:45 PM, 05/15/10

Tom I have said in the past and I will say it again.

You made a believer out of on the usefulness of a EV (at least for city driving) and of course I have to respect anyone who willingly overloads a already fairly heavy prototype vehicle.

txmatt1 says:

09:27 AM, 05/16/10

knitbeanie - I don't really know what your complaint is.

Think $600/month is too expensive for a 2 seat EV with insurance included and almost free fuel?

Don't lease one.

To keep with the polio vaccine analogy, it's like saying the first batch of research vaccines was pointless because they cost thousands of dollars each and many hundreds of man hours to produce for that one batch. Of course, the subsequent widespread availability of the vaccine and all of its benefits would never have occurred without those first expensive and laborious samples.

Thinking back on, the Wright Flier was a real dog with only 12 horsepower and one-passenger capacity and stayed aloft for less than a minute. What a waste if it's not something usable on a grand scale.

Everyone's entitled to their opinions, but the electric-driven vehicles of tomorrow (whether battery-electrics, plug-in hybirds, fuel cell, etc) will have their legacy in the first models we're seeing today.

tomm250 says:

12:45 PM, 05/16/10

siarizona: Yes, It's just a small step but necessary if we are going to begin the transition to electric mobility and I do believe we are. It will undoubtedly take a while and a lot of people will be very reluctant but at least the auto manufacturers are making more and more efficient gas & diesel engines in the interim.

hybris: Thanks again for the compliment. I feel like I need to send you flowers or something ;)

txmatt1: I'm with you 100%. This is going to be a long process and bringing EV mainstream will take a lot of private & public investment which thankfully is currently happening. I'm not sure many people actually know how much investment is currently being put in the industry. Thankfully it seems that the major about manufacturers have finally realized they need to build and sell EV's to be competitive in the next decade so they are starting now. Within 3 to 5 years there will be at least one an EV in every auto manufacturers lineup and battery technology is getting better and cheaper at breakneck speeds. As anthonylam66 said above I think this is the beginning of the biggest development and change in the automotive industry since the Model T incorporated the assembly line.

Tom M
MINI-E #250 @ 30,410 miles
http://minie250.blogspot.com/

mheikka says:

07:22 PM, 05/16/10

I really like Tom's posts. It is fun to "ride along" with a cutting edge early adopter.

It is also good to have an objective source of information about EVs available. Too much of the information about the current state of EVs is from biased parties - either auto companies with a large investments to promote (or old technology to protect) or naysayers who think that EVs must reach some unattainable level of performance and affordability that is always 20 years out.

Tom's experience demonstrates that the start of the transition to EVs as personal transportation is possible now, with some compromises, for appropriately situated consumers. In his case, the compromises are largely economic, as his experience shows the technologies are nearly showtime ready.

So while Tom and one small fleet of electric Minis aren't "saving the world" they are eliminating the arguments against large EV technology/infrastructure investment and expedited consumer trials of existing EV technologies. I suspect Nissan's Leaf program will create a number of new "Toms", beginning this December.

Great posts, Tom..

chicagotex says:

12:37 AM, 05/17/10

You really think you can answer whether or you'll lose range over time after 11 months? Really?

Unless you think buyers are going to invest in this kind of lifestyle for just a year at a time and then go back to gasoline or diesel powered cars, I think you should hold that answer in reserve until you've given it more time (not miles).

I'm also not a fan of the fact that you seem to have totally glossed over the fact that your car has spent 50 of it's 330 or so days in service. No buyer can tolerate their sole transportation being useless over 15% of the time, meaning it's only useful as a second (or more) car.

Most folks need their cars to get to work and do necessary errands... every day... for 5+ years. The fact that you have alternate transportation at the ready while your electrodream is constantly in the shop and that you feel good about it after a whopping not-even-a-year hardly qualifies as shattering the "electric leash".

tomm250 says:

04:04 AM, 05/17/10

Chicagotex: Yes I can answer whether I'll lose range over time after 11 months. I could have answered that after 11 minutes. It hasn't yet, but of course the car will!

This is a test mule, a prototype vehicle with no plans to be offered for sale. If I were "glossing over" the fact that it has been in for service for 50 cumulative days I could have just never mentioned it and nobody would know. There are two big reasons it's been in for service so long: First, we have to bring the cars in every 4,000-5,000 miles so the engineers can download data and then they check over the whole system. I have had to bring it in 6 times to do that so far so there was about 10 days right there. Secondly, as I wrote above, I hit a huge pothole going about 55 mph and messed up a lot of things in the front end. This would have happened if I were driving any MINI Cooper so that cost me another 14 days of service. So what it really comes down to is the car needed service that was related to the battery system twice and it took about 26 days out of the 339 days I've had it so far, and BMW waived a months lease payment because of the service visits. Still not good if you had bought this as a new car, but this is a beta test vehicle and we all knew here were going to be some issues. Buyers would not have to "invest in this lifestyle" because this is a closed test program, with restrictions and obligations that we have to follow. We are finding the issues so buyers won't have to.

Of course most folks need a reliable car for every day and for over 5 years. They don't drive a prototype test vehicle that is still in the research phase and three years from production like the BMW EV that we are working on is. We are doing this so that the 2013 BMW EV will have these issues worked out, and yes battery life is one of the issues. Better battery chemistry (like BMW is currently working on) combined with a sophisticated thermal management system will greatly improve the performance and lifetime of the batteries, with 150,000 to 200,000 miles expected to be attainable in the near future.

Finally, yes I do feel good about what I'm doing. I have really enjoyed driving this car all year. I've enjoyed meeting lots of interested people that stop and ask me questions about the car, many of which I let take it for a drive. I also like the fact that I'll be able to look back on this in the future when there are millions of electric cars on our roads and say I was there in the beginning and hopefully made a difference.

Tom

Add a comment

Advertisement

Latest Poll

My next car will have:

Advertisement

Tip the Editors

Got a breaking news tip for the Inside Line editors?

Send it to tips@edmunds.com

Awards

min's Best of the Web award

Past Vehicles

Browse Archives