Put a fork in me, 'cuz I'm done. Done with vacation. Done with sleeping in different places every other night. Done with doing laundry on the road. And done with living out of a suitcase.
But one thing I'm not done with is the 2009 Ford Flex. If I were willing to take on a car payment right now, I'd own one -- tomorrow. But my 2003 Honda Odyssey is paid off and still has some miles left in it, so I'm probably going to remain on the sidelines until 2010 or 2011.
Or not. These past two weeks are likely to renew talk among the Edmunds clan of replacing the old minivan. If asked, all four of our right brains would march down to the local Ford dealer right now. A goodly portion of our left brains would go along, too, because the Flex makes sense for our family on a variety of levels.
The only part of the brain -- OK, my brain -- that is holding back is the region devoted to money and the fear of spending it at this moment in time.
In case you're not in the same cheapskate mode as I am right now, here's what we liked -- and disliked -- about the Ford Flex on this vacation.
+1 Ride & Handling: The steering is sure and the Flex goes down the road with effortless ease. And no one got carsick the whole time, despite miles of mountain roads -- unheard-of with my family. Kudos to the chassis development engineers.
+1 Seat Comfort & Space: There's plenty of space in all three rows, and the seats are comfy and supportive. Adults as tall as me (6'-2") fit in the 3rd row.
-1 Headrests: My wife and I share this gripe. The front headrests jut too far forward. Not sure if this issue gets relief on 2010 or not.
-1 Steering Wheel Reach: I won't waste time here, because this problem goes away when a telescopic steering wheel finally arrives sometime in 2010.
+1 Storage Space: Sure, our minivan has more cubic feet -- it's a taller box. But the Flex sports a minivan-like deep well behind that the 3rd row emerges from -- it easily holds luggage or groceries when the 3rd seat is in use.

+1 Electronics: Sync, Bluetooth, iPod integration, satellite radio, navi, traffic -- it's all here. And few other automakers tie it all together as seamlessly as this Ford. And our girls took full advantage of the aux inputs to play Wii on the rear DVD screen about half the trip. Our '03 Odyssey is crude by comparison.
+1 Grade Assist: This speed-regulating transmission mode works sort of like off-road Hill Descent Control, but at regular highway and freeway driving speeds. Much better than expected after I lived with it.
-1 No discreet gear selection: Even with the above system, I still want to choose my own gear in certain situations. "D" and "L" alone don't cut it.
+1 The Duratec 3.5L V6: Enough power for this trip. I never really found myself bemoaning the lack of the PowerBoost EcoBoost twin-turbo direct-injection V6 that's coming in 2010. Still, if the mpg is the same as this engine, as it's reported to be, why the heck not? Bottom line: There are no bad choices in this department.
-1 Interior Fit and Finish: What I would like is the Limited in content, but without the fake wood (or even real wood) and without so much obvious plastic-chrome trim on all of the knobs. I'd like to see the inside that is a bit more high tech - maybe even a touch of Steam Punk. The interior does not have the same "it" factor that the exterior has. Audis have it. Our Nissan 370Z has it. I wish I could get it here.
+1 Looks: I've always said that whoever comes to market with the first cool minivan will rule the family hauler segment. The Ford Flex is it, even though its more of a tall wagon/CUV thingy. Sure it doesn't have sliding doors, and OK it holds a wee bit less than our Odyssey. But this thing looks like a big Scion xB -- in a good way.
Don't like the hearse look? Don't buy all black. Go for the surfmobile look instead. Just choose bright red or brown, and then add the white roof. Point is, my wife was dragged kicking and screaming into the minivan world. She really appreciates her Odyssey now, for all the logical reasons you care to name, but her fashion sense has never made peace with the thing. But she LOVES the Flex. Thinks it's cool. And she's right.
FInally, here's the final trip tally of fuel economy...
Total miles driven: 2,496.2 Total fuel added: 115.9 gallons Total Fuel Cost: $360.42
Trip average fuel economy: 21.5 mpg (24.6 mpg best, 19.4 mpg worst)
[EPA rated fuel economy is 17 city, 24 highway, 19 combined]
Average in-car meter reading: 22.7 mpg for an exaggeration of 5.3% or 1.2 mpg.
That about does it. When the time comes, I'll be sorry to see this one go.
Dan Edmunds, Director of Vehicle Testing @ 31,705 miles

empowah says:
11:20 PM, 08/25/09
We have a 2003 Odyssey, too - and while it's quick and incredibly voluminous, things are starting to bug me: the ride is absolutely terrible for passengers, the brakes are lousy, the transmission slams into shifts, and you never forget you're driving a tinny, echo-ey van.
I'd gladly sacrifice interior space for some refinement. Crossovers are where all the manufacturers are investing their R&D dollars these days. It's a shame they're all so pricey.
kissel1 says:
04:28 AM, 08/26/09
Dan,
All children are wonderful...even SPECIAL ones like yours!
carguy622 says:
05:23 AM, 08/26/09
How do we go about getting Kissel banned? I'll start the petition.
neuspeed says:
05:46 AM, 08/26/09
empowah - minivans are just as expensive as crossovers......I paid $32k for ours a few years ago and my brother just laid down $37k for the latest VW (aka rebadged Chrysler) minivan.....
dougtheeng says:
05:55 AM, 08/26/09
Great overall review of the Flex. I can't imagine how the BMW would have worked for you on this trip. Good call on the vehicle selection.
sammin says:
06:03 AM, 08/26/09
The most expensive jap.suv.rovers.land.yahcts.esclades can't bet this vehicle from FORD!
fuhteng says:
06:29 AM, 08/26/09
+1 carguy. Most of the posts have been awful, but this is WAY below the belt.
Dan - thanks for taking us along on your trip. It is write-ups like these that got me interested in this site to begin with. Thanks again!
tdzro says:
06:45 AM, 08/26/09
You can thank NHTSA for the new "farther forward" headrest design. All vehicles will be getting new headrests to prevent whiplash and most customers will not happy that their headrest will be so far forward. All in the name of safety. Soon we will be wearing helmets while driving.
arumage says:
06:52 AM, 08/26/09
tdzro,
That's not exactly true. The "farther forward" headrest is only necessary for those vehicles without active headrests. Here's a demo video from Nissan. Hyundai offers it on a few vehicles as well.
http://www.nissan-global.com/EN/TECHNOLOGY/INTRODUCTION/DETAILS/ACTIVE-HEADREST/
stephen987 says:
06:57 AM, 08/26/09
The Flex is so much more fully realized than the underwhelming Edge. If I had kids, this would be on my short list, for sure. In fact, it might be the only thing on the list.
adavis2493 says:
07:01 AM, 08/26/09
That see flips pretty violently....
adavis2493 says:
07:02 AM, 08/26/09
^^Seat***
carguy622 says:
07:19 AM, 08/26/09
Ford owns Volvo (as of now) they should just pluck some Volvo headrests off the assembly line.
actualsize says:
07:37 AM, 08/26/09
@empowah: The rear suspension of our '03 Odyssey has always bugged me, too. The rear squats too easily and it gets all out of synch with the front when there's any real weight in the back, such as passengers in the third row. Who knew a minivan would be asked to do THAT?
Oh, and I'm about to install a third set of front brake pads (I'm including the ones that came on it when new in this total) at just under 60,000 miles. Weak.
wobbly_ears says:
07:38 AM, 08/26/09
kissel1 is a jerk. Go to hell.
Inside Line Editors, please ban kissel1.
jedienigma says:
07:45 AM, 08/26/09
The end of a vacation and the end of another great string of posts regarding the Flex.
This blog has been very helpful in showing how such a new model of vehicle works in the real world. Right now my wife and I are trying to find a replacement for our '03 Taurus that drowned in a flash flood event. Originally only Odyssey and Sienna were being considered. However after addressing my wife's concerns regarding ride comfort and storage capacity with this blog, the Flex is the forerunner. In fact I go by the dealer today to pick up the one I like for a test drive, and luggage test similar to the earlier luggage test posted.
I am curious about how much the staff will miss the Flex when it leaves the long term fleet.
ptcdawg says:
07:54 AM, 08/26/09
I'm seeing more and more Flexi on the road here in the Atlanta area. They seem like a very good compromise vehicle for those who need the room.
ocramida says:
08:07 AM, 08/26/09
Dan I've looked at a Flex (albeit for much less time than you) and agree with all of your comments. Interior design is the most objectionable to me. Why did Ford have to use fake wood and that horrible steering wheel? An Audi-ish or VW-ish interior would definitely make the Flex a complete package. Not surprising I had the same feeling about the new Tuarus interior. Though materials quality appears to be very good the overall design is decidedly "uncool", especially given the existence of the very cool class-leading SYNC.
relyt says:
08:09 AM, 08/26/09
I like the interior features of the Flex, but the exterior styling was enough to keep us from buying one. If we could get the interior of the the Flex, with a shell more like the Edge, we may have had a winner. Instead, we bought a Kia Sedona. (Not much better, I know, but far more 'normal' looking.)
bankerdanny says:
08:21 AM, 08/26/09
Interesting comment and reader follow ups on the headrest issue. My wife, who likes to drive with the seatback nearly vertical has a terrible time with the front headrest in our Subaru. They hit the back of her head in such a way that it is forced forward and down. Terrible design compromise is the name of "safety".
bodyblue says:
08:23 AM, 08/26/09
The Fords in the IL fleet have been some of the most trouble free in recent memory.....in any price range. I really hope this translates into changing the "perception" that all cars made overseas are good and American cars are not. Ford is clearly the American leader....Mopar and GM are trailing but catching up......(lets hope the Ram performs well)
wobbly_ears says:
08:31 AM, 08/26/09
I agree with Dan & others comments about the interior design. The design is too retro for me, what with all the fake wood & chrome & the green gauges. It should have been modern & futuristic like European designs. The interior design looks too much like the 80s station wagon.
felonious says:
08:52 AM, 08/26/09
Posting from my phone, just finished a four-day rental of a Flex @ Alamo. I have been considering a purchase based on posts here. I loved the ride, handling, brakes, and of course the passenger space. Unfortunately, I've decided that it's just a tad too big for my family of three. Can anyone recommend something with similar characteristics, but smaller? I might have to get the big guy just to get that sweet Sync system though. Too bad the rental didn't have it.
wobbly_ears says:
09:06 AM, 08/26/09
@felonious
You might want to take a look at a Kia Rondo, Mazda 5 or a Hyundai Elantra Touring.
felonious says:
09:10 AM, 08/26/09
My co-worker just got a 5 and has been pushing me in that direction. Talk about ugly! :) We take lots of road trips, how is it for that?
actualsize says:
09:11 AM, 08/26/09
I don't like the Edge nearly as much as the Flex. It should not be viewed as a smaller version of it, I think.
actualsize says:
09:33 AM, 08/26/09
@ felonious: I'm mixed on the Mazda 5, but I can't say I've taken a long road trip in one. I do like the idea of sliding side doors when kids are small and need help getting into car seats, though. But the car seat stays in the middle row, so any extra adult passengers (grandparents, etc) end up in the third row. I don't remember the Mazda 5's third row as being adult sized, even for short trips. And I can't remember if the folding seat third-row access is blocked when a single car seat is bolted firmly in place. If applicable, look at your friend's 5 with these things in mind. Also, families of three tend to turn into families of four. (All of this assumes you have a budding family of three. Forget it if this is not the case.)
7driver says:
10:01 AM, 08/26/09
Dan,
I'd suggest buying this particular one when it's LT duties are done, but I'm guessing your love letters to the Flex has compromised your negotiating position :-)
Oh well. You were probably holding out for the telescoping wheel anyway.
arumage says:
10:44 AM, 08/26/09
@felonious:
You might take a look at the Hyundai Santa Fe. At 184" long, it's 18" shorter than a Flex, but it has a 3rd row that's good enough for short rides with adults, although it has nearly no cargo space with the 3rd row up.
I hope Ford brings over the S-Max. That would be ideal for me. It seems to bridge the gap between a full size minivan and a Mazda5, which is a little smallish for me.
DCuerpoJr says:
10:53 AM, 08/26/09
If I had a family or needed a people hauler the Ford Flex would be among the top of my list.
hybris says:
11:18 AM, 08/26/09
So far I love the Flex but if there one thing I don't like beside the fake wood its the fact I can't get cloth seats in the limited. Beyond that it might make a decent alternative to the F350 diesel in the same price range.
misterfusion says:
11:38 AM, 08/26/09
Dan: Awesome wrap-up, thank you for the details. And I apologize for the thread-hijacking...
Felonious: I'm in exactly the same boat as you, I would like the Flex if I had a bigger family. But I don't, and so I'm considering the cars that Wobbly_ears mentioned, plus a few more:
* Mazda 5 -- most practical interior, but worst EPA mileage of cars I'm considering
* Kia Rondo -- eliminated from contention due to worse mileage than the Mazda
* Hyundai Elantra Touring -- Best mileage (non-diesel or hybrid), lowest price = best value, but weakest engine of cars I'm considering
* Chevy Equinox I4 (2010) -- 2nd best mileage (non-diesel or hybrid), best interior (IMO), but most expensive when equipped as I want it
* Chevy HHR -- Better mileage than Mazda, comfy ride over L.A.'s destroyed streets, but overpriced without incentives
* VW Jetta Sportwagen TDI -- 2nd best overall mileage, but small passenger volume & 2nd most expensive after tax credit...plus, that VW reliability "question mark"
* 2010 Toyota Prius II -- The dark horse. I really want the space of a wagon/crossover, but the 2010 Prius has the best mileage of all contenders, with fewer compromises than the previous model. And it's priced more reasonably than I thought (I'm looking at you, Escape Hybrid!).
actualsize says:
11:47 AM, 08/26/09
Don't forget the Scion xB. The new one was large enough for our family for a 4-day road trip to Arizona. Decent power and room. It would work well if I had one small child.
http://blogs.edmunds.com/roadtests/2008/03/2008-scion-xb-arizona-rocks.html
Go to the "Past Vehicles" navi on the right to isolate the Scion, then you can scroll to the other blogs from this road trip.
wobbly_ears says:
12:01 PM, 08/26/09
@misterfusion & @Felonious
How about the Kia Soul? I haven't seen one in person but it seems large enough. Moreover, if I remember it correct, it has ESC, EBD & Traction Control standard. If I'm hauling kids, I would go for the safest one.
dougtheeng says:
01:16 PM, 08/26/09
"How about the Kia Soul? I haven't seen one in person but it seems large enough. Moreover, if I remember it correct, it has ESC, EBD & Traction Control standard. If I'm hauling kids, I would go for the safest one."
I have a Kia Soul even though there is only one of me (ie no kids). IMO, the 'trunk' or 'hatch' space behind the rear seats is pretty small. I think you'd be hard pressed to get gear for a family of 4 in there, though it may be possible if everyone packs reasonably. The Soul has a lot of rear passenger space, and the compromise is the hatch area.
misterfusion says:
03:08 PM, 08/26/09
@Dougtheeng & Dan:
That is also my problem with the xB. Dan, I remember your posts about that trip, but I still can't figure out how you packed all that stuff into that car. The hatch area just seems too small for my needs -- or at least not worth the sacrifice in mileage, which is pretty bad for a car that size. (Also, I just don't think I could live with that dash design long-term.)
OTOH, the Soul is not quite as small as it seems. I saw one next to a BMW X3, and the Soul looked to be about the same size! Not that that's a major accomplishment, but I had assumed that the Soul would be closer to the xD in size -- but it's not at all.
felonious says:
05:00 PM, 08/26/09
Thanks everyone for the feedback! Keep it coming. :)
Misterfusion, the Jetta TDI wagon is also high on my list. The thing I don't like about it is that it's not much of a space improvement over my current S4 Avant. However, MPG improvement would be ginormous, and the payments would be a lot smaller. I'm not sure if I can live with the VW instrument cluster though, it REALLY bugs me. Shame, huh?
anilpunjabi says:
07:19 PM, 08/26/09
ur awesome - thanks for the video it really answered my question about the third row seat if a 6'3 guy can fit in here than thats allright
hondapilot2004 says:
07:16 AM, 08/27/09
We had two Odysseys... a 99' and an '06... The 99 was a little rough around the edges... but it was still a fine car... we sold it to a landscaping company a couple years ago upon acquiring the 2006 car which we still have. I must say that is probably the best car we have ever owned. Im in Myrtle beach right now we drove down with it from NJ, the car was loaded down with lots of suitcases, my family and a bike rack with 3 bikes... and the car felt like it was just putzing around town. Plus the car's comfort factor all the way around is just great... and the car drives INCREDIBLY WELL... you guys with 2003 Odysseys would do well to trade up to a 2009.. its a great car.
actualsize says:
08:06 AM, 08/27/09
I hear you Hondapilot2004, the current-generation Odyssey is nicer than mine, for sure.
But I'm a little turned-off by how much bigger it has become and my girls have grown to the point where they can open and close hinged doors by themselves with no trouble.
Now comes the Flex with it's minivan-style disappearing third seat (and the deep storage well that comes along with it), shorter height (and the better body roll feeling that comes with it), better-intergrated infotainment and a much cooler look. Advantage Flex, in my book.
felonious says:
09:36 AM, 08/27/09
Argh! Decisions, decisions... To add to my indecision, I get home to my Audi and am reminded of all it's good qualities - a true sport + utility vehicle. If the ride quality was my only issue, I'd get some good coilovers and be done. I'll have to think about that. My wife really wants to get rid of the big payment, though.
hondapilot2004 says:
11:34 AM, 08/27/09
Hmm.. i do see your points for the flex as well actualsize... and yes i must admit the new Odyssey is huge compared to the 2004 Pilot we also have.. our car doesnt have the navi system so i cnt defend it against your infotainment comment. However i can say that the Odyssey does not roll very much and its very sure of its moves.. its a very well planted car... and i have read elsewhere that the Odyssey drives a lot better than the Flex.
felonious- what kind of Audi do you have?
hondapilot2004 says:
11:36 AM, 08/27/09
Im 17... and the 2004 Pilot is my car... between the two cars i prefer the Pilot over the Odyssey... but i must give the Odyssey credit where it is due.. theyre both fine cars
felonious says:
01:20 PM, 08/27/09
Hondapilot2004, I have a 2005 S4 Avant. I figured everyone knew that by now, I feel like I mention it too often. :/
hondapilot2004 says:
01:38 PM, 08/28/09
ooo nice... you should keep the car. im sorry Felonious im a new user forgive me for not knowing
felonious says:
04:40 PM, 08/30/09
I probably will keep it, at least until I'm not underwater anymore. The Flex keeps calling to me, though...
_markvgti_ says:
08:03 AM, 09/18/09
The Flex is the first (and so far only) box-on-wheels design that I have actually liked. I don't see the hearse comparison (Flex is so much better looking than those ugly Cadillacs), and I really like the styling of this vehicle.
Why does anybody have any doubt that this is a CUV?
Sliding doors have too negative a connotation to them (despite the obvious practical advantages) and would have been a total sales killer.
I LOVE the utility and convenience of sliding doors, especially when parked in a tight spot.
I just can't understand why a $40K vehicle would not have tilt-AND-telescoping steering wheel standard. Only sub-$10K vehicles have a legitimate excuse.
Manual control should be offered with all automatic transmissions, at least as an extra-cost option (if need be, to give it that premium vibe). It shouldn't cost more than $300 extra (if that!).
The only non-American automatics I have driven have been: a one or two generations old Mitsubishi Lancer (rental), a previous gen Accord V6 (test drive) and Volvo S40 (test drive). The Accord and Volvo automatics were never in the wrong gear. Accord's 5-speed auto had automatic grade logic control: didn't have to push any button. Didn't get to test this feature on the Volvo's 6-speed auto, but it was good too (the turbo engine spins at only 1900 rpm in 6th gear!).
The Lancer's unassuming auto was pretty decent.
All other auto-equipped cars I've driven have been rental cars and futhermore have been American models. All these automatics uniformly sucked (perhaps all of them were the older 4-speed ones).
I've never owned an automatic-equipped vehicle.
_markvgti_ says:
08:05 AM, 09/18/09
I forgot: also drove the Altima 2.5 with automatic (yes of course it was a rental) over 2-3 days. Verdict: decent (i.e., didn't make me hate it).