Long-Term Road Tests

Daily updates on our fleet of cars and trucks

2008 Smart Fortwo Passion Coupe: New Beetle?

Beetle20,000,000byVWag.jpg

U.S. sales of Volkswagen Beetle, 1952: 390 units.

U.S. sales of Volkswagen Beetle, 1968: 400,000 units (5 percent of the total U.S. market).

Pictured above is the celebration at the Volkswagen assembly plant in Mexico as production of the Volkswagen Beetle officially ended on July 30, 2003. A total of 21,529,464 Volkswagen Beetles had been built.

This reminds me that while it's easy to make fun of transportation pods, the Smart might be the start of something important.

Then again, maybe the Smart is more like the BMW Isetta, which was not exactly something big.

Michael Jordan, Executive Editor @ 18,680 miles

BMWIsettabyBMW.jpg   

Categories: ,

18 Comments

7driver says:

11:45 AM, 07/14/09

A few differences betwix the Bug and the Smart:

The Bug was so dirt simple and cheap to maintain that even a toddler could do it and pay for the parts by pawning off his diapers. Swapping an engine took about the same amount of time as swapping a tire. The rebuilt engine cost about as much as a nice dinner.

The Bug drove like a real car, albeit much slower. Bend it into a turn and it responds just like a real car would except at much lower speeds. You could even drift it if you were really talented.

mhart27 says:

12:02 PM, 07/14/09

I don't think that the top picture is from 2003. Look at the clothes the people are wearing. Late 70's, maybe early 80's?

mhart27 says:

12:04 PM, 07/14/09

Plus the number in the pic is 20 million, which leads me to think that this was a celebration of that milestone.

bankerdanny says:

12:15 PM, 07/14/09

I choose B. The Beetle (of which I owned 2) was cheap, reliable, easy to repair, practical and for it's day fuel efficient.

The Smart is cheap (to buy at least, see below) and fuel efficient, although since it requires Premium, the 40mpg is not as valuable as it would be on regular.

But practical? I don't think so. And based on what I have seen in the posts, it's not going to cheap to fix, even if it's cheap to buy.

This car will never be more than a novelty in the US as it's currently configured.

fuhteng says:

12:30 PM, 07/14/09

mhart27 - this is Mexico. I think that explains it.

I hope it isn't the new Beetle! Yikes. It is an insult to cars.

canadia says:

12:35 PM, 07/14/09

The Beetle was an affordable econobox that offered good value for the dollar.

The smart is an overprice abomination-on-wheels whose only reason for still having evaded the chopping block is its quirky styling and ultra-chic and eco-friendly image.

They're both small cars. The similarities end there.

This comparison reminds me of an old, and stupid, joke: What's the difference between a turtle and a garbage truck? They both have wheels, except the turtle.

txmatt1 says:

01:18 PM, 07/14/09

The Tata Nano, if it makes it to the states, could be the spiritual successor to the original Beetle (rear engine, rear drive, no power steering, cheap, and simple).

dalaw says:

01:26 PM, 07/14/09

Agree with mhart27. The quality of the picture is definately not from 2003.

canadia says:

01:34 PM, 07/14/09

In Mexico, fashion and camera technology are 30 years behind the rest of the civilized world.

texases says:

01:52 PM, 07/14/09

From a 'Day in History':

"May 15, 1981 - 20,000,000th Bug Produced -
The 20,000,000th Volkswagen Beetle was produced at the Volkswagen plant in Puebla, Mexico. Volkswagen first came to Mexico in 1954 as part of a museum exhibit entitled "Germany and Its Industry." That same year, 250 Beetles were assembled in Mexico. By 1962, Volkswagen had acquired its first assembly plant in Xalostoc, where the company would eventually assemble 50,000 Beetles. Pleased with the new Latin American marketplace, Volkswagen executives made plans to construct a facility in Puebla, a city an hour south of Mexico City. In 1967, the first Beetle was produced at the Puebla plant. Before closing, the Puebla plant produced more than 1.6 million vehicles."

sealclubb3r says:

02:33 PM, 07/14/09

I'm surprised no one has mentioned the Volkswagen Up! VW themselves are calling it the spiritual successor to the Beetle.

darthbimmer says:

04:07 PM, 07/14/09

I agree with others that the Smart and the Beetle are only superficially alike. The Beetle was a revolution in small, practical, and economical transportation. The Smart simply looks economical because it's small. Any of several Japanese subcompacts have similar price and fuel efficiency but are safer and much more practical.

BTW, I love the wind-up crank in the Isetta pic. Everyone here knows it's a joke, right?

firstwagon says:

04:08 PM, 07/14/09

I don't think anything will ever be the next "Beetle".

The world has changed and the original Beetle was as much a icon of it's time as it was a good piece of "engineering".

uncanny_man says:

05:26 PM, 07/14/09

Both the beetle and the smart are small and crappy underpowered cars that get high marks for cuteness. However, the beetle's crappiness came at a bargain basement price, the smart is just a bad deal. I truly hope the smart will never be as widespread as the beetle.

roadburner says:

11:47 AM, 07/15/09

Heck, I'd buy an Isetta rather than a Smart. A concours quality 300 can be found for less than $15K, and you won't lose any money to depreciation.

alberto845 says:

05:53 PM, 07/15/09

re: fuhteng and canadia
I'm sorry, but those comments only make you look ignorant. You should try traveling a bit more, and expand your horizons.

alberto845 says:

06:00 PM, 07/15/09

Regarding the photo, look at how there are first-gen Golfs and Jettas in the background. This couldn't from 2003, since VW's Puebla plant was producing MkIV Jettas and New Beetles at the time.

briancam says:

11:19 AM, 07/17/09

Really, cars like the Honda Fit, Ford Focus or Mini Cooper are the modern VW Beetle. Funny, it seems as if everyone has forgotten (even VW) that there already is a New Beetle.

Add a comment

Advertisement

Recent Posts

Advertisement

Browse Archives