Home

Long-Term Road Tests

Daily updates on our fleet of cars and trucks

2009 Dodge Challenger R/T: The Textcast

Challenger textcast 1.jpg

Magrath: My brain feels like mush today. I can barely type. It's kind of awesome.
Magrath: Up for lunch ramen?
Sadlier: Eh, I gotta get some cam-seal-swapping supplies at an auto parts store somewhere
Magrath: They rarely have good ramen.
Sadlier: What, auto parts stores? You'd be surprised
Sadlier: Kragen on Lincoln is a dark-horse candidate for best miso ramen in LA
Magrath: Exiting Kragen on Lincoln was the first time I fully unloaded the potential of a 335i. I headed south from that parking lot in a blaze of confused glory. I had no idea what that car was capable of.
Sadlier: Speaking of confused glory, we should do those SEMA mods to our Challenger that Chris mentioned
Magrath: All the grey stuff?
Sadlier: That's right. Or keep it black. Murder it out, dude
Magrath: Walton's point was that he feels like he's driving something super-cool when he's behind the wheel even though it's bone-stock. I feel completely ridiculous in that car all the time. Like I'm driving a clown car.
Sadlier: I'm somewhere in between. I feel super-cool when I'm on the throttle at least, not so much the rest of the time. But I'm definitely with Chris on digging the SEMA concept
Magrath: I like the SEMA concept because it lacks color. I'm over colors. I still think the car is ridiculous.
Magrath: And getting on the throttle in that car is a huge disappointment. It's a cool noise but where's the forward momentum?
Sadlier: I dunno, it's pretty fast
Sadlier: I think you've been driving the GT-R too much again
Magrath: It's not fast.
Sadlier: Hm, 5.9 to 60. Alright, not that fast
Magrath: Yep. 0.8 seconds ago the 135 was at 60.
Sadlier: But the Challenger sounds bitchin'. And you know, I'm alright with 5.9 to 60. I can live with that
Magrath: I can't. The 135 smokes it, and it doesn't have the aura of a chubby dude working at Home Depot who loves to talk about the glory days of high school football
Sadlier: Well, that's where the SEMA mods come in
Magrath: Then you look even MORE desperate.
Magrath: The only thing that could reduce the desperation oozing from that car is a crusher.

Sadlier: Note that the 5.9 to 60 is with two shifts
Magrath: Great so they didn't get the gearing right either.
Sadlier: Well, the 5,500 rpm redline or whatever isn't helping
Magrath: I really like the shifter actually. It fits my arm and hand perfectly.
Sadlier: I could do without the weird angle, but it's surprisingly decent, yes
Magrath: Thing is, I like driving the Challenger. It rides well. Nice and comfy. Quiet. Good sightlines, good driving position...it's just that the outside is so pathetic.
Magrath: It's the automotive equivalent of a class ring: people wearing them don't want to accept the present, constantly grasping at the past.
Sadlier : So it's a refined GT with an image problem. SEMA mods to the rescue!
Magrath : You know the guys you see on Sunset Blvd at night? 40+, wearing clothes that were trendy in 1999, trying to be hip, trying to figure out why they aren't cool anymore. Those are Challenger people.
Sadlier : Yeah but the SEMA Challenger is badass. Adrien Brody might drive one
Magrath : Adrien Brody drives a Z06, what does he know?
Sadlier : Exactly!Challenger textcast 3.jpg
Magrath : It is, if I remember correctly, pretty cool and "murdered out," but still....
Sadlier : I want a Z06, and I want a SEMA Challenger
Magrath : SEMA can't fix what's wrong with the Challenger. It's like assuming that plastic surgery cures the aging process.
Sadlier : You're saying the Challenger's problems are more than skin-deep? I thought you agreed that it's fundamentally a good car. The backseat is enormous. So is the trunk, if I recall correctly. V8, nice ride, quiet...what more do you want, aside from steering that doesn't suck?
Magrath : Actually you're right. The Challenger's problems are entirely skin deep. The analogy needed more depth. Try this:
Magrath : SEMA doesn't have what it takes to fix the Challenger. Its problems may only be skin deep, but simple add-ons won't do it. It's like assuming that a face lift reverses aging. The Challenger is a solid car but the design -- both inside and out -- is too old to salvage. Like Joan Rivers.
Sadlier : But the interior materials are pretty good. And I like the seats.
Sadlier : Give me the SEMA exterior treatment and some feel and precision from a steering wheel that couldn't reasonably be swapped into a city bus, and I'm onboard
Magrath : The dash is thick and the seats are comfy but the look....gah...it's so, so, Chrysler.
Magrath : Short of giving me one with the stipulation that I can't sell it and buy something else, there's no way I'd own a Challenger.
Sadlier : Still, I'd rather have the Challenger's overall refinement and forgettable interior design than, say, the 370Z's painstakingly designed/crafted interior and ridiculous road and engine noise
Magrath : Road and engine noise, sure, but also stellar driving manners and non-ridiculous looks. Challenger textcast end.jpg
Sadlier : Psh. I think the Challenger is way cooler-looking than the Z
Magrath : You're not embarrassed to get into that car?
Magrath : Swinging open the 11-foot door doesn't fill you with shame?
Magrath : It's like buying a Britney Spears CD, or a ticket to see the Sex and the City movie.
Sadlier : Your mushy brain is on a roll today
Magrath : Or, worse, it's like buying those items that, every once in a while, your girlfriend needs at the convenience store. That's a more apt example.
Magrath : You go in, find what's needed, grab it and head for the register. There's a point where your eyes will meet those of the clerk and you'll want to explain, "Really, guy, these aren't mine. Clearly." But he'll know that. It's how these things work. I want to explain to everyone who sees me in the Challenger that I don't in fact own something this sad. If I get it for a weekend I'm going to have to put on a bumper sticker that says "My other car isn't desperate."
Sadlier : The only things that fill me with shame are the dorky ride height and wheels on our long-termer
Sadlier : If you got the SEMA car for the weekend, you'd change your tune
Magrath : I don't think I would. At that point people would assume that I've not only bought one of these stupid things, I also like it enough to mod it.
Magrath : OR...
Magrath : They'd think I bought a car that I initially didn't like, so I had to monkey around with it to make it tolerable.
Magrath : Like going to a restaurant, seeing they have nothing you like and, instead of leaving, walking to 7-11, buying some canned vegetables, and smearing them all over what the chef serves you.
Sadlier : Your analogies are on fire
Magrath : I need a video camera on me at all times.
Magrath : I think you could probably make this into a textcast.
Sadlier : Oh, I sure will
Magrath : Last word: I kind of dig the old Challengers. People driving them today have to pay for the privilege either with hard work and a lot of time, or with a metric-bucket of cash. The new one is riding on the coattails of past glory and I just can't get behind something like that. The new Camaro on the other hand, I'm 100% behind that. Gold Chain Lane , here I come.

Categories:

35 Comments

slickersdrip says:

03:35 PM, 05/ 5/09

I really enjoy these textcasts.

I've gotta say I'd go for a new Camaro over the Challenger, but it's still a very good looking car if you ask me. I'd be proud to be seen in it.

greenpony says:

03:51 PM, 05/ 5/09

I have to disagree with Mike. The Challenger is one badass looking car. Go ahead. Try talking about it without saying badass. It might not be the most fleet-footed V8 powered coupe on the market, but it more than makes up for that deficit with sheer presence. If this sounds vain or superficial, I'd argue that choosing a car starts with looks. It's hard to consider a car you'd be ashamed to be seen in. If Chrysler was synonymous with reliability and wasn't bankrupt, this car would be on my short list.

caheew says:

04:01 PM, 05/ 5/09

The Challenger is a cool car to look at, not to own. I sure as heck wouldn't. Not my kind of car, and everyone would think I'm trying to hard to be cool.

Hah, Magrath was on fire!

stephen987 says:

04:23 PM, 05/ 5/09

OK, so the Challenger with a 5.7 liter V8 and a stick is about as quick as a 335d--a DIESEL automatic with about the same usable interior space and 2x the mpg.

The Challenger is a handsome car, but I liked it less after I sat in one.

ajla says:

04:32 PM, 05/ 5/09

Didn't the long-term Challenger run a 5.5 0-60 time?

That puts it equal to the 0-60 times Edmunds got for the 650i and CL550, which are both closer to the weight and size of the Dodge than the little 1-series.

firstwagon says:

04:41 PM, 05/ 5/09

"OK, so the Challenger with a 5.7 liter V8 and a stick is about as quick as a 335d--a DIESEL automatic with about the same usable interior space and 2x the mpg."

A whole lot cheaper and better looking though.

It also has more street appeal. Everyone notices a Challenger rumble by. No one looks twice at a 3 series anymore.

compliance says:

04:45 PM, 05/ 5/09

There's no complaints in there that can't also be levied at the Mustang or Camaro. Although I like the way the Challenger looks, I also see that it is damn silly. I think that's mostly caused by the size. Give me a Challenger at .75 scale and I'd be in love.

As is I'd still take one over a Z. That car just doesn't have soul to me.

uncanny_man says:

05:45 PM, 05/ 5/09

So, your biggest problem with this car is that it looks like an american car? You really shouldn't be reviewing cars with that kind of bias. Seriously.

subytrojan says:

06:06 PM, 05/ 5/09

Well done, gentlemen! Funny stuff!!! =Þ

edubya says:

07:06 PM, 05/ 5/09

Come on, uncanny, not all American cars have proportions so out of sorts. I'm with Magrath. This car tries a little too hard to be cool. I kind of feel sorry for it.

stovt001 says:

08:29 PM, 05/ 5/09

I'm with Magrath, slightly. I'm not so hardline about it, but I find the Challenger retro for the sake of retro. It has to copy its past because that's all it has. The Camaro and Mustang, on the other hand, nod to their past because they've developed nicely. They're modern, but they stayed true to what they were originally about too.

Also, I can't get on board with the Challenger because the wheels and interior are no different than any other Chrysler. There is no sense of occasion, nothing special once you get past the reproduction kit car exterior.

benson2175 says:

08:59 PM, 05/ 5/09

I agree completely. I was ready to like this car; then I saw how big it is, how unrefined everything about it is, and how bloody expensive it is. It also doesn't post great numbers for handling or acceleration. This thing is a golf club carrier for old fogies re-living missed opportunities. It's kinda pathetic.

uncanny_man says:

12:15 AM, 05/ 6/09

In my opinion, this thing is like a powerful cruiser bike instead of a sports bike, and that's perfectly okay. It doesn't try to pretend to be anything other than a dodge challenger, and I can respect that. It is a large, comfortable, powerful, relatively efficient and distinctive coupe, so I don't know why Magrath or anyone else would seemingly loathe it so much. I'll take this over an accord coupe or many other of the more practical sporty cars.

johnnyr3 says:

04:06 AM, 05/ 6/09

Magrath is bang on. Sadlier is off the reservation. The Mustang, Camaro and even the Genesis Coupe embarrass this thing. Edmunds should have gotten one of those instead of the Challenger.

Hell, I'd wager any Nissan/Infiniti with a 3.X in its name would probably leave it for dead. So what have you got? A dog who's bark is more "badass" than its bite. "Desperate" is very apt.

Chrysis is so far behind the curve it's not funny.

blankfocus says:

05:36 AM, 05/ 6/09

Haha. Funny stuff!

I'd still buy one.

ahightower says:

07:30 AM, 05/ 6/09

The comment about it being "geared wrong" because it takes two shifts to get to 60 is dumb. 60 mph is arbitrary and irrelevant. It's time to use 0-70 and 0-80 as performance benchmarks. 70-0 braking tests are far more relevant, and catching on in popularity, it's time to do the same with acceleration tests. But in the real world, all I care about re: gear spacing is whether it "feels" right, stays in the power band. This is a cruiser, not an S2000, we won't be going anywhere near the redline in real life. They probably used a very low 1st gear to help that fat pig jump off the line. If that's the case, I wouldn't expect 2nd to take it all the way to 60. And who cares? if I'm going balls-out from a standstill, I probably won't stop at 60 mph.

Anyway, the more I look at it, the more I think it's too tall. Hips are too big. Lowering would help, and bigger wheels perhaps. By the time you get done fixing it with mods, you will have spent enough to just get the SRT in the first place.

crowb says:

07:57 AM, 05/ 6/09

It was like watching a mongoose fight a slug. Magrath is a gun slinger, like Roland himself, with those texts. We'll have to start calling him the Devil's paint brush, because he's rapid fire all over the place. Machine gun Mike.

Good stuff, guys. Funny, entertaining. I love these.

chuckg says:

08:12 AM, 05/ 6/09

I picked-up my ordered black Challenger R/T about 10 days ago. It is strange to be on Edmunds and see pictures of my car.

I have never owned a car with this much presence. Camera phone pics, looks, thumbs up, questions, even buying gas can be a chore.

I'm a member of a forum devoted to the Challenger. This car is being bought by people in all age groups and income brackets. You'd be surprised at the number of girls buying this car. Also lots of military people and police officers.

Some people are using their cars as daily drivers but I'd have to say that most are bringing the car out in nice weather and just go cruising. Because of this and other factors you will never see Challengers on every corner.

The Challenger is a big car. I personally like big cars. I've never bought a small car and never will.

To me my Challenger is a cruiser. And at 25mpg on the highway with a big powerful V-8, it just doesn't get any better than that.

People that don't "get" the Challenger don't own one and probable couldn't afford one. This car is not cheap. I ordered my car in February at employee pricing and it still cost plenty.

Get this. One member over on the Challenger forum was at the dealership having mods installed. A guy comes over to him and asks if that was his car. He says yes. The guy says he's buying one as well. And what does this guy drive. A Maybach!! And now he has a Challenger to go with it.

I could go on and on about the Challenger. If you get the opportunity to pick one up just do it. The Challenger experience is too good to pass on.

I LOVE my Challenger!!

altimadude00 says:

08:46 AM, 05/ 6/09

compliance -- I'd have to contend you comment that the Nissan Z has no soul. Nissan Z-cars have a longer production history and better track record than Dodge Challengers. Just because they don't cruise Woodward Avenue, lay down carpets of rubber, and burble into the nearest sock-hop soda shop doesn't mean the Z-cars aren't without a soul.

dougtheeng says:

09:00 AM, 05/ 6/09

I still enjoy this car and I'd still buy one. It has presence, and I don't find it goofy/sad at all.

I don't get how the Camaro would get a pass whereas the Challenger is a no go.

dougtheeng says:

09:06 AM, 05/ 6/09

"People that don't "get" the Challenger don't own one and probable couldn't afford one. "

Chuckg, I agree with most of the comments in your post but the above is an idiotic statement.

chuckg says:

09:25 AM, 05/ 6/09

Dougtheeng- Do you own a Challenger? I hope so. The Challenger is a very special vehicle.

dougtheeng says:

10:29 AM, 05/ 6/09

chuckg: no I don't....but I can assure you its not because I can't afford one.

I "get" the challenger - I'm just pointing out that your statement about not "getting" the car because one cannot afford it is ridiculous logic. Its not even logic.

chuckg says:

10:42 AM, 05/ 6/09

dougtheeng- I was just taking a dig at the haters, that's all. It's all good. :)

boxermike says:

10:42 AM, 05/ 6/09

"People that don't "get" the Challenger don't own one and probable couldn't afford one."

I don't "get" why anyone would buy a Versa, I can afford one of those, though. I don't "get" facial tattoos, again, I can afford one.

It's about taste, perception and execution, not cost.
-mm

Monocrom says:

11:05 AM, 05/ 6/09

I agree... Magrath should have a video camera keeping a close eye on him at all times. I'm sure we can find a couple of nice, strong, men in white coats to help out with that. :P

Seriously though, the new Challenger is far from embarassing. It's a chick magnet. (Hell, it's a guy magnet too). Everyone is drawn to it, like moths to a flame. It's not sad or outdated. Some things are cool forever. They're timeless. Like a leather jacket, you put on a muscle car; and it gives you instant cool points. Cars don't age like people. There's no such thing as bald muscle cars.

Muscle cars aren't like the sad dude who cruises the high school parking lot years after having graduated. They're like the girls who inhabit the high school parking lot after class lets out for the day... Years go by, but THEY stay the same age. Same with muscle cars... THEY'LL always stay cool.

johnnyr3 says:

11:19 AM, 05/ 6/09

"People that don't "get" the Challenger don't own one and probable couldn't afford one."

LMAO! What a joke!

The way Chrysis's sh%t is hitting the fan right now I bet by the end of summer I'll be able to afford TWO!


misterfusion says:

11:43 AM, 05/ 6/09

I dunno... Magrath reminds me more of Kevin Ryder -- they'd both be annoying to work with. :P

(Pardon my obscure SoCal reference.)

badblackrt says:

12:06 PM, 05/ 6/09

Wow, that whole thing was pitiful!!!

Obviously your impressions of the Challenger are personal and very much the minority!!

There is no disputing that this car was a Car Show Darling since it first appeared.... Chrysler moved forward with the project because of overwhelming praise of the car. That is indisputable!!

Your weak comments are very disputable!!!

I love my Challenger and so does everybody that sees me around town.

Finally, stop being ignorant about the Chrysler Bankruptcy.. Anyone who understands business knows that the result of the Bankruptcy and Fiat merger Chrysler will emerge stronger than before.

benson2175 says:

12:48 PM, 05/ 6/09

Finally, stop being ignorant about the Chrysler Bankruptcy.. Anyone who understands business knows that the result of the Bankruptcy and Fiat merger Chrysler will emerge stronger than before.

That's a joke right? You're being facetious.

mnorm1 says:

01:38 PM, 05/ 6/09

"Anyone who understands business knows that the result of the Bankruptcy and Fiat merger Chrysler will emerge stronger than before."

Now that's wicked funny. So Barney Fife + Olive Oyl = Conan the Barbarian?

badblackrt says:

01:39 PM, 05/ 6/09

@benson2175,

Go back to your porn!!

hondacura4 says:

06:16 PM, 05/ 6/09

I undestand this cars strikes a huge chord with muscle car enthusiasts, however given the sticker price I saw on the SRT-8 version ($54K) at my local Dodge dealer I can think of other muscle cars that do EVERYTHING better for much much less money. Id easily choose a Camaro SS or Mustang GT Track Pack over any version of the Challenger.

To me the Challenger exhibits a lot of style but no substance to back it up. Other than the styling what does it have that makes it interesting? This car comes accross as a pure marketing excercise.

I know the Chrysler 300C is virtually the same car but I find it much more appealing and sensable.

alaska44 says:

03:45 PM, 05/ 8/09

I absolutely, totally enjoy my new Challenger R/T. I traded my 2008 Chrysler 300 Touring AWD for it. This car is an experience. You know how some cars out there where never anyone's choice? They had to 'settle' for it, cuz that was all they could get? Not this car. No one is giong to buy it and say, 'Man, sucks to have had to settle fot THAT'.

Buying a car is a matter of taste. I always liked the old Chevy Camaros style, but hated the build quality. After a year of the 300, I knew the build quality was there, and to then trade it for a looker as well. Not that the 300 was a slouch in the looks department.

No car is all things to all people and can't be. I have yet to have anyone say, 'Man, that is sad. What are you trying to prove?' Most comments are 'Great car, how you like it?'

That said, the 2006 SRX is my winter car.

My secret hope is that Chrysler survives somehow, but that the Challenger fails. I don't want everyone driving one. I like having a car that is different and is competent at what I want it to do. Let Mustang and Camaro continue the fight and let my deep water blue R/T be the odd man out. It always was in the day. I can't imagine how they can refresh it, nor the 300, as they are so locked into a look. So it might run as long as the last one, four years.

vpoint says:

03:16 PM, 05/24/09

You have to remember the Challenger is old school, the trunk is mafia rated, the back seat is actually usable, it's a cruiser and a bruiser.

A highway star that always turns heads, time warped back from a place where big butts were the norm , GTX's, Road Runners, Goats and Chevelles.

It was sedan cruising at it's best, and yes, the new Challenger is more style over substance, but that's ok.
Tell me someone who hasn't bought something simply because they just liked the way it looked, or dated someone just because they were good looking and could care less about their personality, thats the new Challenger.

Add a comment

Advertisement

Latest Poll

Has reading the Long-Term Road Test Blog helped in your car purchasing decisions?

Recent Posts

Advertisement

Tip the Editors

Got a breaking news tip for the Inside Line editors?

Send it to tips@edmunds.com

Awards

min's Best of the Web award

Past Vehicles

Browse Archives