Home

Long-Term Road Tests

Daily updates on our fleet of cars and trucks

2008 Subaru Impreza WRX STI: Still Feels Light, Still Accelerates Hard

stionlonelyroad.jpg If you look back at recent STI blog entries, you'll get the idea that our 2008 Subaru Impreza WRX STI feels older than the 19,000 miles on its odometer. Its worn Dunlop SP Sport 600 245/40R18 93W tires are creating all kinds of road noise, and a few editors have complained that the STI feels sloppier on lumpy pavement  and that rattles now plague its hatchback body.

Yet, the basic elements that make this car likeable remain intact. Even without an aggressive clutch dump, acceleration is still brutal off the line. As quick as our Evo GSR has become, its turbocharged 2.0-liter never quite feels as (delightfully) abusive or sounds as distinctive as Subaru's 2.5-liter turbo four (305 hp at 6,000 rpm, 290 lb-ft of torque at 4,400 rpm) does in standard tune.

Also, our long-term WRX STI still feels light -- in a good way. It doesn't weigh that much for a powerful, all-wheel-drive car; we've never tested a current-generation STI that came in more than a pound over 3,350 lbs. I like the feeling of driving a (relatively) unencumbered car, and I'm willing to give up some things to get that feeling. Which means I'm willing to put up with the STI's overly isolated steering.

Of course, any discussion about the STI always comes back to our long-termer's optimistic $39,678 price tag. Who would pay that, everyone wants to know. So just to see, I priced out a 2009 Subaru WRX STI...

I want the gold BBS wheels on mine, but I don't want the WR Blue Mica paint, so it's Satin White Pearl for me. I definitely don't want the factory navigation system. But I do want the rubber cargo tray, and I'd like a short-throw shifter (which our LT car, of course, does not have).

pricedouta2009STIonFeb182009.jpg

So according to the Edmunds.com mother site, I'm looking at $38,186, and something tells me that in February 2009, there's room to negotiate that down a little. It's still going to be more expensive than a 2009 Mitsubishi Evolution GSR, which is tough to justify. But sometimes I think the prospect of starting with a lighter car with a more interesting engine might offset that.

Erin Riches, Senior Editor @ 19,099 miles

Categories:

37 Comments

coletrickle says:

01:03 PM, 02/18/09

So Edmunds is telling me I can steal this car at $36,700?

This car that's already got its hard plastics rattling, it's thin paint job chipping, it's touchy breaks squeling, and it's trunk-liner roof cover peeling?

I wouldn't pay a penny over of $29,800 for this piece of tin.

eriches says:

01:06 PM, 02/18/09

No, coletrickle, this price is for a brand-new 2009 STI. Read the whole entry, please. -ER

coletrickle says:

01:23 PM, 02/18/09

Right - I understood correctly.

A 2009 STI can be had for $36,700 and THAT is the "bargain" given that MSRP is $38,200.

I fully expected the TMV on this car to be sub $35K, (even with the wheels).

Who's paying up for this car in this economy? I don't get it.

At $36,700 I think know you can get better value elsewhere.

coletrickle says:

01:25 PM, 02/18/09

Cool picture though. Almost makes me want to get one.

compliance says:

01:27 PM, 02/18/09

I think it could be had much lower than that TMV right now.

slickersdrip says:

01:29 PM, 02/18/09

Cole,

I have no idea who is paying for this car in our economy. When the old STI was out I saw a ton of them on the road (still see a fair share of them). Since this new STI has been out, I can count the number of them that I've seen on one hand-- two fingers to be exact. I live in Austin, Texas, too, so a car like this is to be expected (with a younger demographic and a generally high income). I haven't seen too many EVO X's, either.

coletrickle says:

01:37 PM, 02/18/09

In 2001 I bought one of the first bug-eye WRX's. I managed to pay invoice at the time for it (which was tough to do and forced me to go out of state, but I got sweet rocket of a car for under $24,000).

Subaru has lost it's way over the past few years.

This new generation WRX and STI (2008/2009) looks horrendous. Utterly horrendous. And the interior finish, (though perhaps acceptable for the WRX price), is completely absurd and out of place on a $37,000 car. Like Slicker, I've only seen two of the 08 STI's in the wild so clearly I'm not alone in thinking this car is rip-off.

I'm mad.

I'm mad that I sold my bug-eye.

I'm mad that Subaru doesn't get it.

I WANT to buy another WRX or STI but...they're so cheap inside and so flimsy feeling and so godawful ugly that for $37,000 I'll just buy a BMW like everybody else in the world.

louiswei says:

02:25 PM, 02/18/09

Like some others said, at $36,700 it is still at least 6 grands too much. Sure it's a rocket and handles great but its interior makes it not worthy of anything over $30k.

If BMW can price the 135i at $36k I don't see how the STI can cost anything more than that.

huyracing says:

02:33 PM, 02/18/09

All Subaru's feel cheap and make you look like a jackass, but you were a jackass in a cheap fast car with "go anywhere" AWD. Now it is too expensive. The warranty is useless in America, anyways... so just go find a (far better) previous gen STI and go hog wild if you really want a Subaru.

smilez says:

02:39 PM, 02/18/09

Nice post. Who pissed in your Cheerios?

andersendl says:

03:41 PM, 02/18/09

Hate to say it, but Subaru jumped the shark with the newest generation STI. I used to own an '04 STi, and good as the latest model is, the performance/dollar value that made the previous generation STi so compelling just isn't there anymore. Especially now with the the new WRX pushing 265HP. Subaru either needs to cut the sticker price of the current STI down to the low-mid 30s, or seriously upgrade the package (more power, JDM-spec suspension tune, real Recaro interior) vs. the competition -- which includes Subie's regular WRX.

jederino says:

06:05 PM, 02/18/09

I really want to like the WRX, but the interior did make me throw up a little bit in my mouth. Not quite as much as the Cobalt SS, however. Wait a minute, I just realized it isn't just the domestics with poor interiors. I guess I'd prefer a 135i over the STI, but you would have to sacrifice all that 5-door utility. Choices...

Why is the warranty "useless"?

stijockey says:

06:07 PM, 02/18/09

I'm afraid that that there was no shark jumping. Look, the old "really really cool STi" sold for about 30K. I know, I bought one new in '05. The new STI is a much better car, it looks better (no stupid rice wing) handles better, is more practical (hatch) and the interior is way better. I paid low 30s for my '08. Anyone paying MSRP today isn't trying to hard and try driving a 135i in the snow. And if it's not fast enough just spend 2K and go to stage 2...

huyracing says:

07:18 PM, 02/18/09

Regarding the warranty... Subaru got into the habit of denying warranties some time ago, so good luck with that if you plan to drive your car hard. They hate warranty work because they get paid less to do it. I guess your mileage may vary... there may be an honest Subaru dealership somewhere, but I have yet to find one.

blueguydotcom says:

08:04 PM, 02/18/09

After driving an 09 WRX really hard, I'm not sure I could justify going 12k higher for the STI. 24k for a base WRX or 36k for the STI. You can do a lot of modding for 12k. Or just make your house payment for a year.

BallaImpala says:

08:52 PM, 02/18/09

i agree with blueguy,

beat up on the STI all you want. Yeah its a horrible buy. But only because you can have almost as good of a car for a lot less. The base WRX should be the STI's biggest competition. 200 lbs lighter, a similar, almost equally amazing engine, and over 10k less.

subytrojan says:

10:57 PM, 02/18/09

huyracing, the amount dealerships get paid for warranty work probably depends on the rates SOA sets for them. It may not always be less than the customer pay rates. This was my experience working in the service departments of a BMW and Acura dealerships.

blueguydotcom, are you seriously considering a 2009 WRX to replace the MCS? Or did you simply take one for a quick spin?

zeph says:

02:03 AM, 02/19/09

One point everybody overlooks, the WRX and STI are uber hatchbacks. I like hot hatches, and these are as hot as they get.

dalaw says:

03:24 AM, 02/19/09

I see a white 2009 STI sitting at Puente Hills Subaru with a huge "$9,000 off" sticker on its side. Sounds like a steal for anyone in the market for an STI.

dougtheeng says:

06:18 AM, 02/19/09

I love the WRX/STI numbers and I love that they are hatchbacks....but I think they're awful looking. Its a shame, really.

bkochuk says:

08:29 AM, 02/19/09

remember people, the subwoofer costs extra...

Eddie1971 says:

09:23 AM, 02/19/09

I own a 2008 STI, and I have none of these issues:
+ Does not burn a drop of oil
+ I have no squeaks and rattles (btw, I live in New England where the roads are disgusting)
+ my things don't fly everywhere in the hatch on the rubber mat
+ The interior is not cheap.
+ Looks fine to me, and that's all that matters. Plus most people do like the looks.

I have never seen so much garbage and nit picking about a car. Every car is overpriced, and the STI is no different. Personally, I got my STI for $2,000 less than what Mitsu wanted for a Evo GSR. Now you want to talk about cheesy interior......except for the seats, I wouldn't give you 50 cents for it.

kurtamaxxxguy says:

10:16 AM, 02/19/09

From what I've read and have been told, Subaru is strict about proper maintenance and use of the vehicle. Their warranty is very clear about what they cover, and will void over. They warn you in CAPS about oil change requirements.

Change the Subie's oil regularly, do the services on schedule, and don't abuse the vehicle, and they honor the warranty.

Launch control, re-chip, race, or otherwise abuse/alter Subie, and its warranty is toast.

subytrojan says:

12:26 PM, 02/19/09

That's my neck of the woods, dalaw! :o)

LOL @ bkochuk's comment! Tru dat!

Which interior are you referring to, Eddie1971? The Evo's? Or the STI's? I'll assume you're dissing the Evo's. :o)

chelidon says:

04:41 PM, 02/19/09

Those bellyaching over how much better things were in the "good old days" haven't done their math. I did, before I bought my '08 STI, which is worth every penny that I paid (2% under invoice in April 2008, with BBS wheels but not the gawdawful factory Nav -- you can do far better in a nav for far less $$). Looking at the annual rate of inflation, the '08 STI is just about on target. In other words, in 2008/2009 dollars, adjusted for inflation, and with comparable equipment (which you really can't do, the new STIs win hands-down for creature comforts), it's roughly the same cost as those rattletrap stripped-down bugeyes were at the time. Do the math, you'll see it's the case. And in the meantime, cost of manufacturing, transportation, etc etc has gone though the roof, and yet Subaru has managed to more or less hold the line on price, in inflation-adjusted dollars. So contrary to the price whiners, kudos to Subaru for making a car that is civilized enough to drive yer boss around in, yet still goes like stink and handles as well or better than any previous STI, and does as well off-road on snow, ice or mud as it does on the highway.

A better comparison would be against the Mistus, BMW (1- and 3-series), etc, and that's been done to death. For the combination of practicality, AWD for northern climes, and sheer driving fun, there's still nothing else in its league.

tsy says:

06:12 PM, 02/19/09

Actually Erin, if you ditch the BBS wheels (buy aftermarket- they're lighter, better looking, and about the same price if not cheaper) and the short shifter (it's actually harder to shift the short shifter accurately, and overpriced-once again, buy aftermarket) the MSRP drops to $35,717 with your cargo tray- which is nice to have. Figure a sub-invoice deal in this economy and you'd be at below $33,700. With 3.9% financing for 63months.

Sounds like much more reasonable a price? :)

Of course, because it's a Subaru, you'll want to put better tires than the awful Dunlops that come with the car to match your new wheels, and then you'll want more power to match the tires and go stage 1, and then you'll want even more power and go stage 2 as you continue pouring paycheck after paycheck into your car. . . :)

blueguydotcom says:

08:00 PM, 02/19/09

Suby, yes I'm seriously considering the 09 WRX. It's basically that or a 328/335. I sold the Mini last week so right now I'm in a rental.

My bro-in-law beat on his WRX for about 6 years and it never failed him. That's interesting. The power, the room, the hatch, the handling, the whole package is pretty attractive for 24k.

I have issue with the 5 speed - wish it were 6 - and lack of freeway cruising gear. I'm worried I'll get 21 mpg with it all the time. Also, a tad worried it's gonna start to feel too boy racer. finally, the idea of paying out for maintenance is odd to me.

Wife doesn't like the cloth. She wants leatherette like my Cooper or leather. as I'm leaning more toward leasing, I can't mod the car with leather.

Also, the lease deals on the WRX are a bit awful right now. Or at least the money factor given to me by the dealer was bad. If BMW brings back a good rebate to clear inventory tomorrow, I'll go for them. The 328 will be cheaper to lease (much more so with the included maintenance) and I get a $500 rebate from BMWCCA.

I'd prefer a lease as I want a 1 series or M in 3 years. A used BMW would make the 1/M a bit more likely too...

subytrojan says:

10:43 AM, 02/20/09

blueguydotcom, that sounds like a decent plan you have there.

While you would have to have routine maintenance done on the WRX, Subaru does have a wear item limited warranty to cover items under *normal* use.

https://www.subaru.com/my-subaru/warranties-2009.html

Wear Item Limited Warranty

Wear item coverage is 3 years or 36,000 miles, whichever comes first. Items covered are brake pad/shoe linings, clutch linings, and wiper blades.

The MY2008+ Imprezas don't seem very boy-racer in my opinion. And that's something I like about them. I'm guessing fifth gear is fairly tall on the current WRX. My 2004 WRX will turn 3,000 RPM @ 75 mph in fifth.

I prefer cloth seats as I feel the seats hold me a little better in the turns compared to (relatively slippery) leather. :o)

I wouldn't fault you if you got a Bimmer, though! :o)

eriches says:

10:50 AM, 02/20/09

Blueguy, seriously? You might go back to an E90? As I recall from years past on this blog, you were never really happy with your 330i.

blueguydotcom says:

03:48 PM, 02/20/09

I'm totally caught between my love of fun and utility in one package (WRX) - v. a known commodity. As BMW didn't change the rebates for this weekend, it's all about either a used e90 bimmer or a WRX hatch.

Precision handling and comfort or hammer-like workman/brutal fun. If I buy it I can mod it but my wife is really against buying new in this market. She knows by the time our kid is 3 I'll be clamoring for something else and she's worried I'll suck up the depreciation on a Rex.

Erin, is that a vote for the WRX? :)

eriches says:

04:43 PM, 02/20/09

You bet it's a vote for the WRX -- I don't want to hear you complaining that the sport-package 328i is too soft and slow. :)

Either way, I see a lowered suspension in your future.

blueguydotcom says:

10:22 PM, 02/21/09

Erin i woke up set on the 09 WRX. I had a 1 PM appt. This morning I dropped into a dealer for a spin in an 07 335i manual. It was the same route I took when I bought my 03 ZHP.

I didn't buy that 335i manual. Instead I got my mitts on another CPO 335i manual in LA. I paid 27k for it (26.5k with my BMWCCA rebate). Edmunds trade-in value for this 335i is higher than what I paid for it. Edmunds lists the car at 33k with CPO. Maybe you guys are off by a couple k. I don't know. I do know I really, really like my new used car.

The 09 WRX had become my #1 choice over the 328i with the automatic. Comparing the manuals on the WRX and 335i...well the bimmer felt like home.

:)

subytrojan says:

01:12 AM, 02/22/09

Congrats, blueguydotcom. We better not hear you complaining about your second E90 in *any* way now.

blueguydotcom says:

08:42 AM, 02/22/09

suby, lol. I hope not. The 09 WRX is a great car... so much car for the money.

huyracing says:

02:18 PM, 02/22/09

hey, congrats of the 335i, great car!

about warranty work, being an actual automotive technician... i am telling you, you get paid less. it varies, but generally its 70% of regular work. as a technician, you can make over $100k a year, but it takes a lot of hustle. (for many, that includes having loose morals)

subytrojan says:

11:48 AM, 02/23/09

huyracing, we had two or three guys that were making about $100K at the BMW dealership I was working at. As a warranty admin who did the "booking," if one is doing his or her job properly and efficiently as a tech, he or she won't make less doing warranty work, at least not when it comes to servicing Bimmers. You also need good service advisors, too.

stivt1962 says:

08:25 AM, 09/10/09

I have an '08 STI with 17,000 miles. Paid 29K with 0% financing. No question this car is worth that amount and it's realistic that others can get close to this price in this market. The WRX, which you can get out the door for 3K less, with some great winter options, is a real steal.

On warranty, I realize I might need to be strident and maybe even offer a tip to the tech/mechanics to do the right thing if anything big comes up. It's a tough game, but SOA is making a big mistake if it puts its loyal customers off by not honoring the warranty if big issues come up. For me, so far, so good, no problems.

As to performance... with a DP, Cobb AP, sway bars (22mm, both ends), proper alignment (dial in neg. camber up front), bracing, the car will beat anything in that price range. These light mods are not expensive and transform the car from excellent to amazing. So for a total of around $32K, I have one heck of a sports car - that cuts through 2 feet of snow and hauls kids and all their stuff too. Love the hatch! Lots of cars can pull G's on smooth tarmac; I just find the Subie's hold the line better than anything else (including the awesome EVO I drove) when things get really bumpy (AKA, the Northeast).

Small takes: Roofline could be a bit lower and seating position a bit higher for my tastes. Interior is great, seats are very comfortable on long rides and supportive enough in the turns. Steering column is a bit bulky and can get in the way. Love the red instruments. Ride quality is perfect. Headlights are powerful. Steering, with mods, great, but could be more communicative. Averaging 23 mpg -improved with DP- would like to see better mileage, like I had with my similarly modded '02 bugeye. I do use the different traction modes in heavy snow. Part throttle could be smoother. OK, that's enough input!

Add a comment

Advertisement

Latest Poll

Has reading the Long-Term Road Test Blog helped in your car purchasing decisions?

Advertisement

Tip the Editors

Got a breaking news tip for the Inside Line editors?

Send it to tips@edmunds.com

Awards

min's Best of the Web award

Past Vehicles

Browse Archives