Home

Long-Term Road Tests

Daily updates on our fleet of cars and trucks

2008 Cadillac CTS: Another View of the Cockpit

ctscockpit.jpg

Recently, a long-time friend informed me that he rented a 2008 Cadillac CTS in San Jose, CA, drove it to Santa Cruz on Highway 17, and loved it. This is a friend who has never owned a domestic-brand car. He's not really even into cars, but he has three requirements for the next car he buys:

1. Rear-wheel drive

2. Sharp handling (up to a point)

3. Able to accommodate his 300-lb bodybuilder frame

The CTS is the first moderately-sized sedan in a long time that he's been able to drive comfortably. (Sedans like the BMW 3 Series and Infiniti G35 have been struck from the list because they pinched his shoulders and restricted arm movement.)

I got into our long-term Cadillac CTS this morning and realized why my friend likes this car so much. The driver seat is broad and flat, and for an average-size adult like myself, there's the sensation of having a lot of room on all sides of you -- more so than I'd get in a G35, a 3 Series or even a 5 Series.

Although the driving position in the CTS isn't perfect, there's a lot to be said for this cockpit if you're on the big side. And I like the fact that the Cadillac can be this roomy without seeming too casual. Even though materials quality falls short of any BMW, there's no denying this is an elegant cabin.

Erin Riches, Inside Line Senior Editor @ 13,051 miles

Categories:

16 Comments

dougtheeng says:

01:06 PM, 09/24/08

I share your feelings on the 3 and G35/G37. My 6'2" frame cannot comfortably fit in those cars....I can manage, but for any amount of travel time, I'd take the CTS in a heartbeat.

bimmerjay says:

01:10 PM, 09/24/08

That is a serious sill anchor for the B pillar.

And I'm shocked to hear that a Cadillac is able to comfortably accommodate large people. :-)

evansc6 says:

01:17 PM, 09/24/08

The CTS is not roomy at all if you're tall. I wanted a CTS when they came out. But despite the CTS being a fairly big car, it was much smaller inside than a 3-series BMW in terms of height. I'm 6'6" and I don't fit into all cars ... it goes with the territory. But this is the first large-ish car that I simply can't even get into.

desmolicious says:

02:38 PM, 09/24/08

So it fits short 300lb guys? Great.

;p

joefrompa says:

03:39 PM, 09/24/08

Bimmerjay - good call on the b-pillar. I actually always feel like thick b-pillars are good for safety, whether or not I'm right I don't know :)

Joe

P.s. I went to test drive a 2002 BMW 530i 5-speed, sport package last night. I'm 5'10, ~185 pounds with somewhat wider shoulders for my height. Those seats cuddled me nicely, but I can see someone 20 pounds heavier or inches wider having a hard time.

slickersdrip says:

03:42 PM, 09/24/08

So BMW obviously should realign their marketing campaign. "The Ultimate Diet Machine. Otherwise, Go Buy a Cadillac. We Don't Need Your American Body."

wetwilly says:

04:07 PM, 09/24/08

Your friend needs to at least take a look at the Hyundai Genesis, which meets all three points. I drove the Genesis and a 2008 CTS at a drive event, and after driving the Genesis the CTS felt claustrophobic. The CTS also felt very American in a not necessarily good way.

firstwagon says:

06:58 PM, 09/24/08

I'm not into luxury cars but I really like the CTS. I like it's American character much more then the bland feel of Japanese luxury cars or the cold distant feel of German cars.

Maybe what I like the most is it totally lacks the stigma of the "look what I bought to impress my neighbours" German luxury cars. No matter how good a BMW, Audi or MB is, most people will think you bought it to show off how much money you have.


One of the few premium cars that are actually cool.

billt9 says:

07:17 PM, 09/24/08

Now I understand why American car seats are designed with no shoulders.
American cars only.

Although for aesthetics' sake, the new 2009 Dodge Ram is designed with shoulders on the seats. Here's to hoping the Dodge Ram can still accomodate 300 lb wide Americans.

firstwagon says:

07:48 PM, 09/24/08

Most "wide" Americans I see would not have a problem with the width at the shoulder level.

But then the 300lb body buider mentioned in the blog is likely not a typical American.

billt9 says:

08:03 PM, 09/24/08

Oh. I misread. I did not take note that those are 300 lb wide deltoids, not 300 lb wide external obliques.

In that case cheers to the CTSes at 24 Hour Fitness parking lots.
The implication that BMW 3-series drivers are skinny weaklings saddens me. What a turn off. Hot women take note.

dragonflight says:

11:29 PM, 09/24/08

@billt9

you can be a small but very fit person! it's all about the density :)

karjunkie says:

11:30 AM, 09/25/08

300 lb bodybuilder????????? He must be 7 feet tall.

stingray454 says:

01:10 PM, 09/25/08

"Even though materials quality falls short of any BMW, there's no denying this is an elegant cabin."

Erin - could you please cite some examples where a BMW 1-series (you said ANY) interior component material quality is better than the CTS' (besides the window switches - we know that one)?

I think the materials quality of the CTS cabin is better than the 5-series overall. Certainly a more stylish design too.

I dunno, maybe I just don't get it, but I have not been impressed with BMW interiors lately. Their older models all seem to have nicer interiors than their latest models. I sat in the new M3, and the first thing that crossed my mind was this interior does NOT look like anything anywhere near what a $55k+ car should look like. I wouldn't say it looked cheap, but one notch above cheap.

If you want to benchmark interiors, Audi, Jaguar, and some Mercedes are the ones you want to use - not BMW interiors.

eriches says:

03:46 PM, 09/25/08

"Erin - could you please cite some examples where a BMW 1-series (you said ANY) interior component material quality is better than the CTS' (besides the window switches - we know that one)?"

The trim on the steering wheel hub and the doortops in the CTS is rough and rubbery to the touch, and for some reason, I always find myself putting my hands there.

Although I don't like everything about our 135i's interior, nothing in it strikes me as outright objectionable, except for maybe the leatherette upholstery. Remember, though, I'm speaking for myself, not the whole Edmunds/IL staff.

billt9 says:

06:51 PM, 09/25/08

I find the CTS interior at autoshows too squeaky to appreciate. Squeaky plastic instrument gauges, squeaky plastic dash, squeaky plastic center console, squeaky... geez does this car have something that doesn't squeak when I touch it?
All it would take at the factory is more glue!

Add a comment

Advertisement

Latest Poll

My next car will be:

Advertisement

Tip the Editors

Got a breaking news tip for the Inside Line editors?

Send it to tips@edmunds.com

Awards

min's Best of the Web award

Past Vehicles

Browse Archives